Jeff Squyres wrote:
That's fine, too. I don't really care -- /public already exists. We
can simply rename it to /tmp-public.
Let's do that. It should (more or less) address all concerns that have
been voiced.
Tim
On Aug 31, 2007, at 8:52 AM, Ralph Castain wrote:
Why not make
That's fine, too. I don't really care -- /public already exists. We
can simply rename it to /tmp-public.
On Aug 31, 2007, at 8:52 AM, Ralph Castain wrote:
Why not make /tmp-public and /tmp-private?
Leave /tmp alone. Have all new branches made in one of the two new
directories, and as
[mailto:bbarr...@lanl.gov]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2007 11:51 AM Eastern Standard Time
To: Open MPI Developers
Subject:Re: [OMPI devel] Public tmp branches
ugh, sorry, I've been busy this week and didn't see a timeout, so a
response got delayed.
I really don't like this format. public
-Original Message-
From: Brian Barrett [mailto:bbarr...@lanl.gov]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2007 11:51 AM Eastern Standard Time
To: Open MPI Developers
Subject:Re: [OMPI devel] Public tmp branches
ugh, sorry, I've been busy this week and didn't see a timeout, so a
response got
