Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: increase default AC/AM/LT requirements

2010-03-25 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
: Thu Mar 25 06:22:17 2010 Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: increase default AC/AM/LT requirements Will these versions of Auto tools work with the 1.4 branch? --td Jeff Squyres wrote: > *** LAST CHANCE *** > > I'm asking yet one more time because it ***WILL HAVE A DIRECT IMPACT ON >

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: increase default AC/AM/LT requirements

2010-03-25 Thread Terry Dontje
Will these versions of Auto tools work with the 1.4 branch? --td Jeff Squyres wrote: *** LAST CHANCE *** I'm asking yet one more time because it ***WILL HAVE A DIRECT IMPACT ON DEVELOPERS!*** We're past the RFC timeout and no one has objected, and I have a patch ready to commit, but be

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: increase default AC/AM/LT requirements

2010-03-24 Thread Kenneth A. Lloyd
-mpi.org [mailto:devel-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Squyres Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 3:51 PM To: Open MPI Developers List Subject: [OMPI devel] RFC: increase default AC/AM/LT requirements *** LAST CHANCE *** I'm asking yet one more time because it ***WILL HAVE A DIRECT IMPACT

[OMPI devel] RFC: increase default AC/AM/LT requirements

2010-03-24 Thread Jeff Squyres
*** LAST CHANCE *** I'm asking yet one more time because it ***WILL HAVE A DIRECT IMPACT ON DEVELOPERS!*** We're past the RFC timeout and no one has objected, and I have a patch ready to commit, but be aware that when I do, you will need the following Auto tools versions for developers builds

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: increase default AC/AM/LT requirements

2010-03-10 Thread Rainer Keller
Hey Jeff, as said I'd be in favor of updating. This would get rid of some of the tests in autogen, speeding up things. Regards, Rainer On Wednesday 10 March 2010 12:07:56 pm Jeff Squyres wrote: > Brian and I chatted about this in person -- he doesn't have too strong of > an opinion here. > >

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: increase default AC/AM/LT requirements

2010-03-10 Thread Jeff Squyres
Brian and I chatted about this in person -- he doesn't have too strong of an opinion here. We checked versions shipped in RHEL: RHEL4: AC 2.59, AM 1.9.2, LT 1.5.6 RHEL5: AC 2.59, AM 1.9.2, LT 1.5.22 Meaning: they're both really ancient. I personally don't mind forcing developers to have more

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: increase default AC/AM/LT requirements

2010-02-25 Thread Barrett, Brian W
I think our last set of minimums was based on being able to use RHEL4 out of the box. Updating to whatever ships with RHEL5 probably makes sense, but I think that still leaves you at a LT 1.5.x release. Being higher than that requires new Autotools, which seems like asking for trouble. Brian

[OMPI devel] RFC: increase default AC/AM/LT requirements

2010-02-25 Thread Jeff Squyres
WHAT: Bump minimum required versions of GNU autotools up to modern versions. I suggest the following, but could be talked down a version or two: Autoconf: 2.65 Automake: 1.11.1 Libtool: 2.2.6b WHY: Stop carrying patches and workarounds for old versions. WHERE: autogen.sh,