Re: [OMPI devel] SIGSTOP and SIGCONT on orted

2006-06-04 Thread Josh Hursey
in Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 9:12 AM To: Open MPI Developers Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] SIGSTOP and SIGCONT on orted Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote: Just curious -- what's difficult about this? SIGTSTP and SIGCONT can be caught; is there something preventing us from sending "stop&

Re: [OMPI devel] SIGSTOP and SIGCONT on orted

2006-06-02 Thread Ralph Castain
"our implementation prohibits this."  :-) My fault - should have been clearer.   From: devel-boun...@open-mpi.org [mailto:devel-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Ralph Castain Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 9:12 AM To: Open MPI Developers Subject:

Re: [OMPI devel] SIGSTOP and SIGCONT on orted

2006-06-02 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
t; -Original Message- > From: devel-boun...@open-mpi.org > [mailto:devel-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Pak Lui > Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 11:37 AM > To: r...@lanl.gov; Open MPI Developers > Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] SIGSTOP and SIGCONT on orted > > I agree that

Re: [OMPI devel] SIGSTOP and SIGCONT on orted

2006-06-02 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
riday, June 02, 2006 9:12 AM To: Open MPI Developers Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] SIGSTOP and SIGCONT on orted Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote: Just curious -- what's difficult about this? SIGTSTP and SIGCONT can be caught; is the

Re: [OMPI devel] SIGSTOP and SIGCONT on orted

2006-06-02 Thread Pak Lui
tting the stop to freeze the application processes. Thanks! -------- *From:* devel-boun...@open-mpi.org [mailto:devel-boun...@open-mpi.org] *On Behalf Of *Ralph Castain *Sent:* Thursday, June 01, 2006 10:50 PM *To:

Re: [OMPI devel] SIGSTOP and SIGCONT on orted

2006-06-02 Thread Ralph Castain
  (If I had to guess, I think the user is asking because some other MPI implementations implement this kind of behavior)   Thanks! From: devel-boun...@open-mpi.org [mailto:devel-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Ralph Castain Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 10:50 PM To:

Re: [OMPI devel] SIGSTOP and SIGCONT on orted

2006-06-02 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
-Original Message- From: devel-boun...@open-mpi.org [mailto:devel-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Pak Lui Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 5:02 PM To: de...@open-mpi.org

Re: [OMPI devel] SIGSTOP and SIGCONT on orted

2006-06-01 Thread Ralph Castain
-Original Message- From: devel-boun...@open-mpi.org [mailto:devel-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Pak Lui Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 5:02 PM To: de...@open-mpi.org Subject: [OMPI devel] SIGSTOP and SIGCONT on orted Hi, I have a question on signals. Normally when I do a SIGTERM

Re: [OMPI devel] SIGSTOP and SIGCONT on orted

2006-06-01 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
27;t do it [yet]. > -Original Message- > From: devel-boun...@open-mpi.org > [mailto:devel-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Pak Lui > Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 5:02 PM > To: de...@open-mpi.org > Subject: [OMPI devel] SIGSTOP and SIGCONT on orted > > Hi, > > I hav

[OMPI devel] SIGSTOP and SIGCONT on orted

2006-06-01 Thread Pak Lui
Hi, I have a question on signals. Normally when I do a SIGTERM (control-C) on mpirun, the signal seems to get handled in a way that it broadcasts to the orted and processes on the execution hosts. However, when I send a SIGSTOP to mpirun, mpirun seems to have stopped, but the processes of the