>> > I would second this - thread safety should be a 1.3 item, unless someone
>> has a lot of spare time.
>> >
>> > Rich
>> >
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: devel-boun...@open-mpi.org <devel-boun...@open-mpi.org>
>>
safety should be a 1.3 item, unless
someone has a lot of spare time.
Rich
-Original Message-
From: devel-boun...@open-mpi.org <devel-boun...@open-mpi.org>
To: Open MPI Developers <de...@open-mpi.org>
Sent: Mon Jun 11 10:44:33 2007
Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] threaded builds
On
this - thread safety should be a 1.3 item, unless someone has a
lot of spare time.
Rich
-Original Message-
From: devel-boun...@open-mpi.org <devel-boun...@open-mpi.org>
To: Open MPI Developers <de...@open-mpi.org>
Sent: Mon Jun 11 10:44:33 2007
Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] thr
On Jun 11, 2007, at 8:25 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
I leave it to the thread subgroup to decide... Should we discuss on
the call tomorrow?
I don't have a strong opinion; I was just testing both because it was
easy to do so. If we want to concentrate on the trunk, I can adjust
my MTT setup.
I leave it to the thread subgroup to decide... Should we discuss on
the call tomorrow?
I don't have a strong opinion; I was just testing both because it was
easy to do so. If we want to concentrate on the trunk, I can adjust
my MTT setup.
On Jun 11, 2007, at 10:17 AM, Brian Barrett
