On 23 January 2009 at 09:09, Christophe Prud'homme wrote:
| It means that, indeed, we _must_ recompile/relink all libs and
| programs in Debian depending on openmpi
|
| Dirk, what do we do ? that's quite a job to do.Perhaps put back 1.2.8
| in unstable with an epoch and upload 1.3 in
On Jan 23, 2009, at 3:09 AM, Christophe Prud'homme wrote:
FWIW, "drop in replacement" in this context means recompile and
relink. We
did not provide binary compatibility between the 1.2 series and the
1.3
series.
that would mean that all libs and programs in Debian depending on
openmpi
Sorry for that, the message was supposed to be a private message to
Dirk. I did not notice (or expect) you override Reply-To.
Best regards
Manuel
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Am Donnerstag, den 22.01.2009, 15:12 -0600 schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel:
> On 22 January 2009 at 15:23, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> | FWIW, "drop in replacement" in this context means recompile and
> | relink. We did not provide binary compatibility between the 1.2
> | series and the 1.3 series.
Das
Dear Open MPI developers,
This bug report just came in against the new Open MPI 1.3 release which we
built the same way as 1.2.*.
Christophe,
Sorry about that. And yes, it should be a drop-in replacement. You can
revert back to 1.2.8 from testing for now. If you have a small
