I committed a minor fix which seems to fix the issue (i.e., if you didn't
already have the .h files generated).
On Feb 20, 2012, at 6:24 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
> It looks okay, Jeff - I ran make diet and all the headers are in the
> resulting tarball.
>
>
> On Feb 20, 2012, at 4:03 PM, Jeff
It looks okay, Jeff - I ran make diet and all the headers are in the resulting
tarball.
On Feb 20, 2012, at 4:03 PM, Jeffrey Squyres wrote:
> FWIW, I think we're still going to have another problem with "make dist" --
> some of the Java header files are generated. I'm not sure we have that ri
FWIW, I think we're still going to have another problem with "make dist" --
some of the Java header files are generated. I'm not sure we have that right
in the Makefile.am.
I committed this fbtl fix; I'll try "make dist" now, but I have to run for a
while. I may or may not get this done by th
Added… thanks.
On Feb 20, 2012, at 5:41 PM, Barrett, Brian W wrote:
> That's because Jeff forgot to copy the line:
>
> AC_CONFIG_FILES([ompi/mca/fbtl/posix/Makefile])
>
>> From whatever configure.m4 script he used as the base for his new macro :).
>
> Brian
>
> On 2/20/12 3:36 PM, "Ralph Ca
s/Jeff/Paul/
Jeff's only fault was trusting me too much.
-Paul
On 2/20/2012 2:41 PM, Barrett, Brian W wrote:
That's because Jeff forgot to copy the line:
AC_CONFIG_FILES([ompi/mca/fbtl/posix/Makefile])
> From whatever configure.m4 script he used as the base for his new macro:).
Brian
--
That's because Jeff forgot to copy the line:
AC_CONFIG_FILES([ompi/mca/fbtl/posix/Makefile])
>From whatever configure.m4 script he used as the base for his new macro :).
Brian
On 2/20/12 3:36 PM, "Ralph Castain" wrote:
>I'm afraid this commit breaks the ability to build from a tarball. I
>c
