Re: [OMPI devel] [OMPI svn-full] svn:open-mpi r19628

2008-09-24 Thread Jeff Squyres
Ah! You are completely correct, sir... we *did* change that field in 1.2.6, and therefore it technically is a regression. So I stand corrected... On Sep 24, 2008, at 3:40 PM, Tim Mattox wrote: Ok, regression might not technically be the right word, but from a user's perspective, it would

Re: [OMPI devel] [OMPI svn-full] svn:open-mpi r19628

2008-09-24 Thread Tim Mattox
Ok, regression might not technically be the right word, but from a user's perspective, it would seem like it. That is, if I understand the implications of the bug that was fixed in 1.2.6 via https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/changeset/17883 Since, prior to that fix, the IBM eHCA got lucky and wor

Re: [OMPI devel] [OMPI svn-full] svn:open-mpi r19628

2008-09-24 Thread Jeff Squyres
For the NEWS: I don't think this was a regression. Did we really have those casts initially and remove them in v1.2.6? I thought Brad said they only first *noticed* it in v1.2.6 -- I don't know where the change actually came from (it could actually be in the hardware or the driver reporti