.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Burette, Yohann <
>>> yohann.bure...@intel.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Paul,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> While looking at the issue, we noticed that we were missing som
;>>
>>>
>>> While looking at the issue, we noticed that we were missing some code
>>> that deals with MTL priorities.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> PR 409 (https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi-release/pull/409) is
>>> attempting to fix that.
>&
at
> ring_c.c:19
> > >>
> > >> (gdb) up 6
> > >> #6 0x7f5bc7717c58 in ?? ()
> > >> (gdb) disass
> > >> No function contains program counter for selected frame.
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Burette,
t ring_c.c:19
> >>
> >> (gdb) up 6
> >> #6 0x7f5bc7717c58 in ?? ()
> >> (gdb) disass
> >> No function contains program counter for selected frame.
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Burette, Yohann
> >> wrote:
&g
gt;> No function contains program counter for selected frame.
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Burette, Yohann <
> yohann.bure...@intel.com> wrote:
> >> Paul,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> While loo
5bc7717c58 in ?? ()
>>> (gdb) disass
>>> No function contains program counter for selected frame.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Burette, Yohann
>>> wrote:
>>> Paul,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> While looking at t
pi/ompi-release/pull/409) is attempting
>> to fix that.
>>
>>
>>
>> Hopefully, this will also fix the error you encountered.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks again,
>>
>> Yohann
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* devel [mailto:devel-boun...
that
>> deals with MTL priorities.
>>
>>
>>
>> PR 409 (https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi-release/pull/409) is attempting to
>> fix that.
>>
>>
>>
>> Hopefully, this will also fix the error you encountered.
>>
>>
>>
>
t;
>> PR 409 (https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi-release/pull/409) is attempting
>> to fix that.
>>
>>
>>
>> Hopefully, this will also fix the error you encountered.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks again,
>>
>> Yohann
>>
>>
&
t;
>
>
> Thanks again,
>
> Yohann
>
> <>
> From: devel [mailto:devel-boun...@open-mpi.org
> <mailto:devel-boun...@open-mpi.org>] On Behalf Of Paul Hargrove
> Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 12:07 PM
>
>
> To: Open MPI Developers
>
>
>
> *From:* devel [mailto:devel-boun...@open-mpi.org] *On Behalf Of *Paul
> Hargrove
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 22, 2015 12:07 PM
>
> *To:* Open MPI Developers
> *Subject:* Re: [OMPI devel] 1.10.0rc2
>
>
>
> Yohann,
>
>
>
> Things run fine with those addi
[mailto:devel-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Paul Hargrove
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 12:07 PM
To: Open MPI Developers
Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] 1.10.0rc2
Yohann,
Things run fine with those additional flags.
In fact, adding just "--mca pml cm" is sufficient to eliminate the SEGV.
-Pa
On 07/21/2015 07:59 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
> On Jul 21, 2015, at 4:38 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>>
>> I see that 1.10.0 can make use of libfabric, but I don't see much
>> documentation on it and certainly nothing in the README file.
>
> Oops; shame on us. We'll update README.
>
>
;
>
> *From:* devel [mailto:devel-boun...@open-mpi.org] *On Behalf Of *Paul
> Hargrove
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 22, 2015 1:05 AM
> *To:* Open MPI Developers
> *Subject:* Re: [OMPI devel] 1.10.0rc2
>
>
>
> 1.10.0rc2 looks mostly good to me, but I still found some issues.
>
-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Paul Hargrove
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 1:05 AM
To: Open MPI Developers
Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] 1.10.0rc2
1.10.0rc2 looks mostly good to me, but I still found some issues.
1) New to this round of testing, I have built mtl:ofi with gcc, pgi, icc,
clang, open64 and
1.10.0rc2 looks mostly good to me, but I still found some issues.
1) New to this round of testing, I have built mtl:ofi with gcc, pgi, icc,
clang, open64 and studio compilers.
I have only the sockets provider in libfaric (v1.0.0 and 1.1.0rc2).
However, unless I pass "-mca mtl ^ofi" to mpirun I ge
Jeff,
Sorry if you already noticed:
It appears that there is no mention of --with-libfabric or
--with-libfabric-libdir in the README for 1.10.0rc2
-Paul
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 6:59 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
> On Jul 21, 2015, at 4:38 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> >
> > I see that 1.1
On Jul 21, 2015, at 4:38 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
> I see that 1.10.0 can make use of libfabric, but I don't see much
> documentation on it and certainly nothing in the README file.
Oops; shame on us. We'll update README.
> Since libfabric
> makes use of libibverbs and librdmacm, does it
Ralph,
Thanks for clarifying.
-Paul
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
> Nathan reminded me today that we started requiring C99 in the 1.8 series,
> so yes - 1.10 does require C99
>
> I went ahead and removed the designators before he reminded me, but I’ll
> leave them out a
Nathan reminded me today that we started requiring C99 in the 1.8 series, so
yes - 1.10 does require C99
I went ahead and removed the designators before he reminded me, but I’ll leave
them out as they aren’t required
> On Jul 21, 2015, at 5:01 PM, Paul Hargrove wrote:
>
> Ralph,
>
> I know y
On 07/21/2015 01:29 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
> Hey folks
>
> 1.10.0rc2 is now out for review - excepting the library version numbers, this
> should be the final version. Please take a quick gander and let me know of any
> problems.
>
> http://www.open-mpi.org/software/ompi/v1.10/
>
> Ralph
I se
21 matches
Mail list logo