In my MTT testing it looks ok, too.
Brad Benton wrote:
Brian,
This is working smoothly now: both the configuration/build and
execution. So,
from my standpoint, it looks good for inclusion into the trunk.
--brad
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 4:50 PM, Brian W. Barrett
mailto:brbar...@open-mpi.
Brian,
This is working smoothly now: both the configuration/build and execution.
So,
from my standpoint, it looks good for inclusion into the trunk.
--brad
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 4:50 PM, Brian W. Barrett
wrote:
> Brad unfortunately figured out I had done something to annoy the gods of
> m
np...i'll give it another try (and will correspondingly endeavor to mollify
the mercurial gods
as best i can).
thx,
--brad
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 4:50 PM, Brian W. Barrett
wrote:
> Brad unfortunately figured out I had done something to annoy the gods of
> mercurial and the repository below di
Brad unfortunately figured out I had done something to annoy the gods of
mercurial and the repository below didn't contain all the changes
advertised (and in fact didn't work). I've since rebuilt the repository
and verified it works now. I'd recommend deleting your existing clones of
the repo
Brian Barrett wrote:
Did anyone get a chance to test (or think about testing) this? I'd
like to commit the changes on Friday evening, if I haven't heard any
negative feedback.
I will run it tomorrow on my cluster.
Brian
On Jun 9, 2008, at 8:56 PM, Brian Barrett wrote:
Hi all -
Per
Did anyone get a chance to test (or think about testing) this? I'd
like to commit the changes on Friday evening, if I haven't heard any
negative feedback.
Brian
On Jun 9, 2008, at 8:56 PM, Brian Barrett wrote:
Hi all -
Per the RFC I sent out last week, I've implemented a revised
behavi
