Re: [OMPI devel] Question about opal/mca/memory/linux licensing

2012-02-15 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Feb 14, 2012, at 6:47 AM, Denis Nagorny wrote: > It seems that I was misled by copyright notices in source files which have no > such exclusion. BTW Are you going to make copyright notices in source files > more consistent with such one in README file? We tried to make as few edits to the

Re: [OMPI devel] Question about opal/mca/memory/linux licensing

2012-02-14 Thread Denis Nagorny
2012/2/14 Jeff Squyres > On Feb 14, 2012, at 6:09 AM, Denis Nagorny wrote: > > I assume you're referring to the ptmalloc implementation under > opal/mca/memory/linux, right? > Yes, you are right. > Specifically, see opal/mca/memory/linux/README-ptmalloc.txt > It seems that I was misled by copy

Re: [OMPI devel] Question about opal/mca/memory/linux licensing

2012-02-14 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Feb 14, 2012, at 6:09 AM, Denis Nagorny wrote: > Investigating memory management implementation in OpenMPI I found that opal's > memory module licensed under Lesser GPL terms. I assume you're referring to the ptmalloc implementation under opal/mca/memory/linux, right? If, so, please read it