We talked about this on the phone yesterday.
Brian, Jeff, Terry, and Rolf were there. George was able to join for a short
period of time.
George's objections seemed to be twofold (please correct if wrong!):
1. Why not change all 3 function pointers to take an additional (void*)?
George misun
George --
Sure. Since I had talked to you and Jeff about it a year ago (when you
added the callback) and you didn't complain, I assumed you two would be the
only ones to care and wouldn't complain this time. Guess I should have
known better :).
Brian
On 11/27/09 18:24 , "George Bosilca" wrot
Brian,
This is a pretty big change to be done with a so short notice, especially over
the Thanksgiving weekend. I do have a lots of concerns about this approach, but
I lack the time to expand on this right now. I'll be back at work on Monday and
I'll give detailed informations. Please delay the
