George Bosilca wrote:
I can't confirm or deny. The only thing I can tell is that the same
test works fine over other BTL, so this tent either to pinpoint a
problem in the sm BTL or in a particular path in the PML (the one
used by the sm BTL). I'll have to dig a little bit more into it, but
I can't confirm or deny. The only thing I can tell is that the same
test works fine over other BTL, so this tent either to pinpoint a
problem in the sm BTL or in a particular path in the PML (the one used
by the sm BTL). I'll have to dig a little bit more into it, but I was
hoping to do it
George -- can you confirm/deny? Is this something we need to fix for
v1.3.1?
On Feb 12, 2009, at 10:15 PM, Eugene Loh wrote:
Got it, thanks.
Is anyone else looking at that ticket? I'm still a newbie and I
suspect someone else could figure this problem out a lot faster than
I could. So
Got it, thanks.
Is anyone else looking at that ticket? I'm still a newbie and I suspect
someone else could figure this problem out a lot faster than I could.
So, I'm curious how much I should be looking at this ticket.
If amateurs are allowed to speculate, however, my guess is that this
is
On Feb 12, 2009, at 2:58 PM, Eugene Loh wrote:
Sorry, what's the connection? Are we talking about https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/1791
? Are you simply saying that if I'm doing some sm BTL work, I
should also look at 1791? I'm trying to figure out if there's some
more specific
The connection is only that, if you are going to modify the sm BTL as
you say, you might at least want to be aware that we have a problem in
it so you (a) don't make it worse than it already is, and (b) might
keep an eye open for the problem as you are changing things.
On Feb 12, 2009, at
Sorry, what's the connection? Are we talking about
https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/1791 ? Are you simply saying
that if I'm doing some sm BTL work, I should also look at 1791? I'm
trying to figure out if there's some more specific connection I'm missing.
Ralph Castain wrote:
You
You might want to look at ticket #1791 while you are doing this - Brad
added some valuable data earlier today.
On Feb 12, 2009, at 12:13 PM, Eugene Loh wrote:
Jeff Squyres wrote:
This should probably include the disclaimer that we talked about
this extensively yesterday at the sm/btl meet
Jeff Squyres wrote:
This should probably include the disclaimer that we talked about this
extensively yesterday at the sm/btl meeting after the MPI Forum
meeting in San Jose.
Eugene has been working on new sm stuff (as he has posted), and we
had a very productive meeting yesterday discuss
This should probably include the disclaimer that we talked about this
extensively yesterday at the sm/btl meeting after the MPI Forum
meeting in San Jose.
Eugene has been working on new sm stuff (as he has posted), and we had
a very productive meeting yesterday discussing what he has done a
10 matches
Mail list logo
