Re: [OMPI devel] accessors to context id and message id's

2007-11-08 Thread Terry Dontje
George Bosilca wrote: On Nov 6, 2007, at 8:38 AM, Terry Dontje wrote: George Bosilca wrote: If I understand correctly your question, then we don't need any extension. Each request has a unique ID (from PERUSE perspective). However, if I remember well this is only half implemented in our PERUS

Re: [OMPI devel] accessors to context id and message id's

2007-11-07 Thread George Bosilca
On Nov 6, 2007, at 8:38 AM, Terry Dontje wrote: George Bosilca wrote: If I understand correctly your question, then we don't need any extension. Each request has a unique ID (from PERUSE perspective). However, if I remember well this is only half implemented in our PERUSE layer (i.e. it works

Re: [OMPI devel] accessors to context id and message id's

2007-11-06 Thread Terry Dontje
George Bosilca wrote: If I understand correctly your question, then we don't need any extension. Each request has a unique ID (from PERUSE perspective). However, if I remember well this is only half implemented in our PERUSE layer (i.e. it works only for expected requests). Looking at the peru

Re: [OMPI devel] accessors to context id and message id's

2007-11-05 Thread George Bosilca
If I understand correctly your question, then we don't need any extension. Each request has a unique ID (from PERUSE perspective). However, if I remember well this is only half implemented in our PERUSE layer (i.e. it works only for expected requests). This should be quite easy to fix, if s