Thanks!
On Jun 7, 2007, at 7:25 AM, Nysal Jan wrote:
I'll cleanup the code and add the granular selction part. It should
be ready by monday.
--Nysal
On 6/6/07, Jeff Squyres < jsquy...@cisco.com> wrote:Ok -- so did
you want to go ahead and make these changes, or did you
want me to do it?
Hi Galen,
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 10:19:09AM -0600, Galen Shipman wrote:
>
> > With current code this is not the case. Order tag is set during a
> > fragment
> > allocation. It seems wrong according to your description. Attached
> > patch fixes
> > this. If no specific ordering tag is
There is something weird with this change, and the patch reflect it.
The new argument "order" come from the PML level and might be
MCA_BTL_NO_ORDER (which is kind of global) or BTL_OPENIB_LP_QP or
BTL_OPENIB_HP_QP (which are definitively Open IB related). Do you
really intend to let the
On May 31, 2007, at 7:25 PM, Ralph Campbell wrote:
I can run the Intel MPI benchmarks OK at np=2 but at np=4,
it hangs.
Bummer.
If I change /usr/share/openmpi/mca-btl-openib-hca-params.ini
[QLogic InfiniPath]
use_eager_rdma = 0
FYI, you can change such values on the command line and/or
On Jun 7, 2007, at 9:11 AM, George Bosilca wrote:
There is something weird with this change, and the patch reflect
it. The new argument "order" come from the PML level and might be
MCA_BTL_NO_ORDER (which is kind of global) or BTL_OPENIB_LP_QP or
BTL_OPENIB_HP_QP (which are definitively
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 11:11:12AM -0400, George Bosilca wrote:
> ) I expect you to revise the patch in order to propose a generic
> solution or I'll trigger a vote against the patch. I vote to be
> backed out of the trunk as it export way to much knowledge from the
> Open IB BTL into the
I just had a discussion with Rich regarding the BTL semantics.
I think what might be helpful here is for us to have telecon to
discuss this further.
I only have one goal out of this, and that is to firmly define the
ordering semantics of the BTL, or alternatively local/remote
completion
Are people available today to discuss this over the phone?
- Galen
On Jun 7, 2007, at 11:28 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 11:11:12AM -0400, George Bosilca wrote:
) I expect you to revise the patch in order to propose a generic
solution or I'll trigger a vote against the
On Jun 7, 2007, at 1:28 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 11:11:12AM -0400, George Bosilca wrote:
) I expect you to revise the patch in order to propose a generic
solution or I'll trigger a vote against the patch. I vote to be
backed out of the trunk as it export way to much
I'm available this afternoon.
george.
On Jun 7, 2007, at 2:35 PM, Galen Shipman wrote:
Are people available today to discuss this over the phone?
- Galen
On Jun 7, 2007, at 11:28 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 11:11:12AM -0400, George Bosilca wrote:
) I expect you
It would be difficult for me to attend this afternoon. Tomorrow is much
better for me.
-DON
George Bosilca wrote:
I'm available this afternoon.
george.
On Jun 7, 2007, at 2:35 PM, Galen Shipman wrote:
Are people available today to discuss this over the phone?
- Galen
On Jun 7,
I'm available this afternoon...
Brian
On Jun 7, 2007, at 12:39 PM, George Bosilca wrote:
I'm available this afternoon.
george.
On Jun 7, 2007, at 2:35 PM, Galen Shipman wrote:
Are people available today to discuss this over the phone?
- Galen
On Jun 7, 2007, at 11:28 AM, Gleb
On Jun 7, 2007, at 12:49 PM, Don Kerr wrote:
It would be difficult for me to attend this afternoon. Tomorrow is
much
better for me.
Brian and I are both out tomorrow. I think what we will do is have a
call today, report back to the group and then if necessary have
another call on
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 02:38:51PM -0400, George Bosilca wrote:
>
> On Jun 7, 2007, at 1:28 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>
> >On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 11:11:12AM -0400, George Bosilca wrote:
> >>) I expect you to revise the patch in order to propose a generic
> >>solution or I'll trigger a vote
14 matches
Mail list logo
