Jeff Squyres wrote:
I think the point is that as a group, we consciously, deliberately,
and painfully decided not to support multi-cluster. And as a result,
we ripped out a lot of supporting code. Starting down this path again
will likely result in a) re-opening all the discussions, b) re-add
Let me make the point that adding a data structure is much less
destabilization to the tree than the routine day-to-day changes that go on
in the tree.
Rich
On 9/23/08 6:24 AM, "Terry D. Dontje" wrote:
> Jeff Squyres wrote:
>> > I think the point is that as a group, we consciously, deliberatel
Hi George,
It seems like some data corruption in Reduce_scatter function
I discovered it when added -DCHECK to IMB benchmark, and it seemed to be
there for ages.
it runs with voltaire MPI, but failes with OMPI. you will get a seqv with
IMB3.1 and error with IMB3.0
host#VER=TRUNK ; /home/USERS/l
Rlaph,
Thanks for the reply. I should be able to build my own.
Tim
Ralph Castain wrote:
Hmmm...well, there -used- to be a tool that was distributed with the
1.2 series for doing just that, but I don't see it in the 1.2.7
release. Not sure when or how that got dropped - probably fell through
Preliminary off-list investigations with Brian Harker (from the users
list) seem to indicate that we do not have a problem with our F90
bindings. It's not conclusive yet, but don't let this hold up 1.2.8.
--
Jeff Squyres
Cisco Systems
All OMPI organizations --
I just updated the trunk AUTHORS file with names and affiliations on
all SVN ID's that have had commits on the trunk. Please check the
spellings of all names and the affiliations for those who have moved
between multiple organizations. For those with multiple aff
