On 8/31/2011 4:48 AM, Ralph Castain wrote:
Perhaps it would help if you had clearly stated your concern.
Yeah. It would have helped had I clearly understood what was going on.
Most of all, that way I wouldn't have had to ask any questions! :^)
From this description, I gather your concern is
On Sep 1, 2011, at 12:52 AM, Eugene Loh wrote:
> On 8/31/2011 4:48 AM, Ralph Castain wrote:
>> Perhaps it would help if you had clearly stated your concern.
> Yeah. It would have helped had I clearly understood what was going on. Most
> of all, that way I wouldn't have had to ask any questions
hi, I found the reason. It is because besides the direct links between 2
PCs, there is another link going through many switches and TCP BTL seems
to use
this slower link. So I run again with eth0 only.
So I build ompi with: ./configure --disable-mpi-f90 --disable-mpi-f77
--disable-mpi-cxx --di
On Sep 1, 2011, at 7:05 AM, Xin He wrote:
> And get the result as in appendix. It seems that TCP has better performances
> with smaller message while TIPC with larger message.
Interesting. Any idea why? From the TIPC paper you sent, one of TIPC's
strengths was that it was supposed to be faste
