We need an accurate way to detect if prepare_src/prepare_dst are being called
for a get or a put operation. I propose adding two new flags to the btl
descriptor (and passing them from ob1/csum/etc):
#define MCA_BTL_DES_PUT 0x0010
#define MCA_BTL_DES_GET 0x0020
Comments? Suggestions? Objections
These two functions target at defining a memory layout (contiguous or not) that
can be target for a one-sided communication. I don't see why there is a need to
know what type of communication that will be … What is so different in the
xpmem that requires the memory to be prepared based on the op
On Tue, 29 Nov 2011, George Bosilca wrote:
These two functions target at defining a memory layout (contiguous or not) that
can be target for a one-sided communication. I don't see why there is a need to
know what type of communication that will be … What is so different in the
xpmem that re
On Nov 29, 2011, at 15:52 , Nathan Hjelm wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 29 Nov 2011, George Bosilca wrote:
>
>> These two functions target at defining a memory layout (contiguous or not)
>> that can be target for a one-sided communication. I don't see why there is a
>> need to know what type of commun
This may seem trivial, but should we name them:
#define MCA_BTL_DES_FLAGS_PUT 0x0010
#define MCA_BTL_DES_FLAGS_GET 0x0020
Although I see there is some inconsistency in how these flags are named, two of
the three original ones have "BTL_DES_FLAGS" in them.
Rolf
rvandeva...@nvidia.com
781-275-5
