Re: [OMPI devel] openmpi-1.8.2rc2 and f08 interface built with PGI-14.7 causes link error

I comfirmed openmpi-1.8.2rc3 with PGI-14.7 worked fine for me except for the openib issue reported by Mike Dubman. Tetsuya Mishima > Sorry, finally got through all this ompi email and see this problem was fixed. > > -Original Message- > From: devel [mailto:devel-boun...@open-mpi.org]

Re: [OMPI devel] openmpi-1.8.2rc2 and f08 interface built with PGI-14.7 causes link error

Kewl - the openib issue has been fixed in the nightly tarball. I'm waiting for review of a couple of pending CMRs, then we'll release a quick rc4 and move to release the final version On Aug 1, 2014, at 9:55 PM, tmish...@jcity.maeda.co.jp wrote: > > > I comfirmed openmpi-1.8.2rc3 with

Re: [OMPI devel] openmpi-1.8.2rc2 and f08 interface built with PGI-14.7 causes link error

Hi Ralph, I comfirmed that the openib issue was really fixed by r32395 and hope you'll be able to release the final version soon. Tetsuya > Kewl - the openib issue has been fixed in the nightly tarball. I'm waiting for review of a couple of pending CMRs, then we'll release a quick rc4 and

Re: [OMPI devel] Trunk broken for PPC64?

Good suggestion, Paul - I have committed it in r32407 and added it to cmr #4826 Thanks! Ralph On Aug 1, 2014, at 1:12 AM, Paul Hargrove wrote: > Gilles, > > At the moment ompi/mca/osc/sm/osc_sm_component.c is using the following: > > #ifdef HAVE_GETPAGESIZE >

Re: [OMPI devel] [1.8.2rc3] build failure on OpenBSD (libevent)

This was apparently somewhat recent - here is the OpenBSD ticket regarding it: http://sourceforge.net/p/levent/bugs/320/ If someone feels it important that we continue supporting OpenBSD, one might explore the solution recommended in that ticket. It's also possible that the libevent guys are

Re: [OMPI devel] [1.8.2rc3] build failure on OpenBSD (libevent)

Ralph, My position on support for OpenBSD is the same as the numerous other operating systems, cpu architectures and compilers I help test on. I feel that every additional platform for which one can maintain support improves the chance of catching bugs in ones code and reduces the effort to port

[OMPI devel] Trak missing Versions for 1.8.x

I was just in Trak to open a new ticket and noticed that the Version pull-down lacks entries for 1.8 and 1.8.1. -Paul -- Paul H. Hargrove phhargr...@lbl.gov Future Technologies Group Computer and Data Sciences Department Tel: +1-510-495-2352 Lawrence Berkeley

Re: [OMPI devel] [1.8.2rc3] build failure on OpenBSD (libevent)

To be clear, I fully support what you say. Ordinarily, I would just do the port, but sadly (a) I am totally buried at work right now, and (b) I have no way to verify that the patches actually work. If/when you have time, do let me know the results and I'll be happy to proceed. Thanks Ralph

Re: [OMPI devel] Trak missing Versions for 1.8.x

Yeah, we remove back entries as we aren't going to backport patches to old releases. On Aug 2, 2014, at 12:59 PM, Paul Hargrove wrote: > I was just in Trak to open a new ticket and noticed that the Version > pull-down lacks entries for 1.8 and 1.8.1. > > -Paul > > -- >

Re: [OMPI devel] [1.8.2rc3] build failure on OpenBSD (libevent)

Ralph, I understand that I am likely the only one in a position to test. I have already completed initial testing of the approach in the bug report you fount at sourceforge: excise the sole *unused* routine that calls arc4random_addrandom(). Assuming the remainder of my testing is successful, I

Re: [OMPI devel] Trak missing Versions for 1.8.x

Not sure I understood that reply. I see Version going back to 1.0, but none for the *current* release series. Is that really the intent? -Paul On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Ralph Castain wrote: > Yeah, we remove back entries as we aren't going to backport patches to old

Re: [OMPI devel] Trak missing Versions for 1.8.x

Hmmm...I'll check with Jeff next week. I'm not sure why we would support creation of tickets for releases that we know we'll never fix On Aug 2, 2014, at 2:26 PM, Paul Hargrove wrote: > Not sure I understood that reply. > > I see Version going back to 1.0, but none for

Re: [OMPI devel] Trak missing Versions for 1.8.x

I'm more concerned with the INABILITY to file bug reports against the current release. One can pick "1.8 branch" but not 1.8 or 1.8.1. -Paul On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Ralph Castain wrote: > Hmmm...I'll check with Jeff next week. I'm not sure why we would support >

[hwloc-devel] Create success (hwloc git dev-180-g16b88a7)

Creating nightly hwloc snapshot git tarball was a success. Snapshot: hwloc dev-180-g16b88a7 Start time: Sat Aug 2 21:01:01 EDT 2014 End time: Sat Aug 2 21:02:28 EDT 2014 Your friendly daemon, Cyrador