Given the other instability on the trunk right now (e.g., PML issues
raised in https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/1087), it seemed
prudent to wait off on merging the ib_multifrag branch into the trunk.
Hopefully, we'll get the new openib stuff in the ib_multifrag branch
committed ear
FYI: there is an issue on the OMPI trunk right now that the tail end
of output from applications may get clipped. The fix is coming this
weekend. If you care, I'll explain, but I just wanted to give
everyone heads up that if you see the tail end of your stdout/stderr
not show up, it's pro
On 7/13/07 7:22 AM, "Sven Stork" wrote:
> Hi Ralph,
>
> On Thursday 12 July 2007 15:53, Ralph H Castain wrote:
>> Yo all
>>
>> I have a fairly significant change coming to the orte part of the code base
>> that will require an autogen (sorry). I'll check it in late this afternoon
>> (can't d
Hi Ralph,
On Thursday 12 July 2007 15:53, Ralph H Castain wrote:
> Yo all
>
> I have a fairly significant change coming to the orte part of the code base
> that will require an autogen (sorry). I'll check it in late this afternoon
> (can't do it at night as it is on my office desktop).
>
> The c
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 06:51:44AM -0600, Ralph H Castain wrote:
> I certainly expect it will be merged in before anything major happens. We
> will likely have to modify it as things progress, and we may have to change
> how it does things, but I expect the functionality will persist.
>
Great. Than
Jeff Squyres wrote:
On Jul 12, 2007, at 1:18 PM, Don Kerr wrote:
- So if you want to simply eliminate the flow control, choose M high
enough (or just a total number of receive buffers to post to the SRQ)
that you won't ever run out of resources and you should see some
speedup from lack of
I certainly expect it will be merged in before anything major happens. We
will likely have to modify it as things progress, and we may have to change
how it does things, but I expect the functionality will persist.
On 7/13/07 12:41 AM, "Gleb Natapov" wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 03:04:01PM
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 03:04:01PM -0600, Ralph H Castain wrote:
> As always, any thoughts/suggestions are welcomed.
>
I hope Sharon's work on process affinity will be merged into the trunk
before this works begins and functionality will be preserved during the
work.
--
Gl
