Our previous mails overlapped, sorry about that.
* Ethan Mallove wrote on Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 06:52:09PM CET:
>
> The above appears to be looking for a Fortran version string from the
> C compiler, but it wouldn't match our version string anyway:
>
> $ f90 -V
> f90: Sun Ceres Fortran 95
Hello Ethan,
* Ethan Mallove wrote on Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 09:24:16PM CET:
>
> I'm seeing the same issue with the faulty "wl" Libtool
> variable in 2.2.6 with Linux SunStudio:
That's really weird, because this change should have fixed that:
I'm probably going to come across as ignorant, and I'm
obviously biased on this matter, but:
* Tim Mattox wrote on Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 02:53:13PM CET:
>
> Although I don't use windows myself, I appreciate your
> and others' efforts to expand the number of platforms
> we can run on. Great work!
On Wed, Nov/19/2008 03:24:16PM, Ethan Mallove wrote:
> On Wed, Nov/19/2008 01:42:55PM, Ethan Mallove wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov/19/2008 05:12:03PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > > Hello Ethan,
> > >
> > > * Ethan Mallove wrote on Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 04:11:23PM CET:
> > > > There are a couple issues
Hi Ralph,
1. since nearly everyone is at SC08, and since next week is a holiday,
the timing of this merge is poor. I would really urge that you delay
it until at least Dec 5 so people actually know about it - and have
time to even think about it
No problem, we can delay it. Dec 9th is the last
HmmmI was just typing this up when Tim's note hit. I also have two
concerns that somewhat echo his:
1. since nearly everyone is at SC08, and since next week is a holiday,
the timing of this merge is poor. I would really urge that you delay
it until at least Dec 5 so people actually
I have two concerns. First is that we really need to focus on
getting 1.3 stable and released. My second concern with
this is how will it effect merging of bugfixes for 1.3 from the
trunk once we release 1.3. Will the following modified files
cause merge conflicts for CMRs? How big is this
