Re: [OMPI devel] mca_btl_sm_sendi question

2009-02-25 Thread Richard Graham
It really does not matter what one does with the sm sends that can't be posted to the FIFO, as long as they are posted at some later time. The current implementation generates does not rely on the ordering memory provides, but generates a sequence number and uses this in the matching, just like

Re: [OMPI devel] Failure to make progress

2009-02-25 Thread Ken Olum
From: George Bosilca Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:54:47 -0500 Your interpretation of the MPI standard is way too optimistic. The text I quoted seemed completely clear to me. However, it was pointed out to me that MPI 2.0, 6.7.2 (in a section about one-sided

Re: [MTT devel] visual reports for mtt

2009-02-25 Thread Jeff Squyres
Just to bring the info to the list... There have been some off list e-mails and some in-person discussions about a fascinating idea that looks promising here. How about moving the MTT data store to the Google Apps Engine/ datastore? See here:

Re: [OMPI devel] mca_btl_sm_sendi question

2009-02-25 Thread George Bosilca
On Feb 24, 2009, at 18:08 , Eugene Loh wrote: (Probably this message only for George, but I'll toss it out to the alias/archive.) I have a question about the sm sendi() function. What should happen if the sendi() function attempts to write to the FIFO, but the FIFO is full? The write