Jeff Squyres wrote:
I take that back -- I just did 3 more builds and was unable to get the
VT build to fail. That's not good. :-(
And I'm never getting there - I still fail in tools/orte-iof, same way.
I tried removing apple's mpi.h in /usr/include, but that wasn't it.
This is a very
On May 14, 2009, at 3:14 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
The Leopard build failed deep in VT, though, with some obscure C++
STL-
looking error -- but OMPI itself built fine. You can compile OMPI
without VT with --enable-contrib-no-build=vt.
I'll send a note to the VT guys.
I take that
Hmm. I just did a build with both the SF.net compilers and then a 2nd
build with the native leopard compilers of openmpi-1.3.3a1r21223.
The Leopard build failed deep in VT, though, with some obscure C++ STL-
looking error -- but OMPI itself built fine. You can compile OMPI
without VT with
On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 19:46 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Ashley, did you rebootstrap with Debian's Libtool?
I'm not sure I understand the question, I did a fresh checkout and
re-ran ./autogen.sh if that's what you mean.
> They enable link_all_deplibs=no in their Libtool
That
Jeff Squyres wrote:
Did you mean to attach something?
yeah, oops. I can't count how many times I've done that
FWIW, I can configure/build on Leopard just fine...? I'm using the
compilers from hpc.sf.net, though. I haven't tried recently with the
native Leopard compilers.
This was with
Blast - wish I could remember, but I did see that once before and now can't
remember the fix. I can build non-tarballs just fine on my Mac, though, so
it could be a problem with the tarball not picking something up.
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 12:41 PM, Bryan Lally wrote:
> Argh.
Argh. This time with attachment attached ...
Bryan Lally wrote:
While we're talking about build failures ...
I haven't been able to build any of the 1.3.x releases on my OS X
machines. OS X 10.5.6 (Leopard) on Intel macs. Attached is the
configure command and the failure from last night's
Did you mean to attach something?
FWIW, I can configure/build on Leopard just fine...? I'm using the
compilers from hpc.sf.net, though. I haven't tried recently with the
native Leopard compilers.
On May 14, 2009, at 2:38 PM, Bryan Lally wrote:
While we're talking about build failures
While we're talking about build failures ...
I haven't been able to build any of the 1.3.x releases on my OS X
machines. OS X 10.5.6 (Leopard) on Intel macs. Attached is the
configure command and the failure from last night's development tarball,
openmpi-1.3.3a1r21223.tar.gz. 1.2.x builds
On Thu, 14 May 2009, Jeff Squyres wrote:
On May 14, 2009, at 2:22 PM, Brian W. Barrett wrote:
We actually took pains to *not* do that; we *used* to do that and
explicitly
took it out. :-\ IIRC, it had something to do with dlopen'ing
libmpi.so...?
Actually, I think that was something
On Thu, 14 May 2009, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hi Brian,
* Brian W. Barrett wrote on Thu, May 14, 2009 at 08:22:58PM CEST:
Actually, I think that was something else. Today, libopen-rte.la lists
libopen-pal.la as a dependency and libmpi.la lists libopen-rte.la. I had
removed the dependency of
On May 14, 2009, at 2:22 PM, Brian W. Barrett wrote:
> We actually took pains to *not* do that; we *used* to do that and
explicitly
> took it out. :-\ IIRC, it had something to do with dlopen'ing
libmpi.so...?
Actually, I think that was something else. Today, libopen-rte.la
lists
Hi Brian,
* Brian W. Barrett wrote on Thu, May 14, 2009 at 08:22:58PM CEST:
>
> Actually, I think that was something else. Today, libopen-rte.la lists
> libopen-pal.la as a dependency and libmpi.la lists libopen-rte.la. I had
> removed the dependency of libmpi.la on libopen-pal.la because it
On Thu, 14 May 2009, Jeff Squyres wrote:
On May 14, 2009, at 1:46 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
A more permanent workaround could be in OpenMPI to list each library
that is used *directly* by some other library as a dependency. Sigh.
We actually took pains to *not* do that; we *used* to do
Hello,
* Jeff Squyres wrote on Thu, May 14, 2009 at 07:56:24PM CEST:
> On May 14, 2009, at 1:46 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
>> A more permanent workaround could be in OpenMPI to list each library
>> that is used *directly* by some other library as a dependency. Sigh.
>
> We actually took pains
On May 14, 2009, at 1:46 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
A more permanent workaround could be in OpenMPI to list each library
that is used *directly* by some other library as a dependency. Sigh.
We actually took pains to *not* do that; we *used* to do that and
explicitly took it out. :-\
Hello,
Ashley, did you rebootstrap with Debian's Libtool?
They enable link_all_deplibs=no in their Libtool which changes some
things and can cause issues like this. Can't hurt to open a Debian
bug report about it (targeted against libtool) so they know this issue
exists.
Can you try working
Hmm. This may not be pilot error. I build OMPI with a pre-installed
OMPI all the time and they don't conflict during the build (i.e., the
building OMPI always uses the libopen-rte and libopen-pal from the
build tree, not the install tree). Here's my link lines for ompi_info:
/bin/sh
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Terry Dontje wrote:
> Ralph Castain wrote:
>
>> Hi folks
>>
>> I encourage people to please look at your MTT outputs. As we are preparing
>> to roll the 1.3.3 release, I am seeing a lot of problems on the branch:
>>
>> 1. timeouts, coming
Ralph Castain wrote:
Hi folks
I encourage people to please look at your MTT outputs. As we are
preparing to roll the 1.3.3 release, I am seeing a lot of problems on
the branch:
1. timeouts, coming in two forms: (a) MPI_Abort hanging, and (b)
collectives hanging (this is mostly on Solaris)
Libtool is 2.2.6. I use debian unstable so it's normally fairly
up-to-date, I suppose it's not impossible that a debian update has
broken things now that I think of it.
I normally build in memfs for speed and have just rebooted my machine
now, a full rebuild has failed again with the same
Hmm; odd. I'm not getting these errors. Just to be sure, I did a
VPATH build and still am not getting these errors... :-\
Are those symbols publicly available in libopen-pal.so?
It does seem pretty weird that your libtool link line didn't pick up
libopen-rte.so and libopen-pal.so...?
Hi folks
I encourage people to please look at your MTT outputs. As we are preparing
to roll the 1.3.3 release, I am seeing a lot of problems on the branch:
1. timeouts, coming in two forms: (a) MPI_Abort hanging, and (b) collectives
hanging (this is mostly on Solaris)
2. segfaults - mostly on
All,
After a svn update earlier I'm getting build failures on the trunk, I've
tried the usual including a full clean checkout and am still getting the
errors.
I'm not doing anything special other than a VPATH build and this same
tree build last week, it's just the update that appears to have
On May 14, 2009, at 9:57 AM, Rainer Keller wrote:
> This generated a bunch of warnings - the "z" length modifier is
not a
> generally supported option, which is why we do not use it.
I see You compile with -pedantic?
Ya, configure adds that automatically if you --enable-picky.
>
Hey Ralph,
On Wednesday 13 May 2009 10:54:43 pm Ralph Castain wrote:
> This generated a bunch of warnings - the "z" length modifier is not a
> generally supported option, which is why we do not use it.
I see You compile with -pedantic?
> btl_tcp_frag.c: In function ‘mca_btl_tcp_frag_send’:
>
Yes, I do. All of them are on BTL_ERROR lines; I think these came in
last night with the opal attribute updates.
Looking at last night's MTT, those attribute changes turned up a LOT
of warnings in various BTLs... Doh!
On May 14, 2009, at 9:34 AM, Ralph Castain wrote:
I'm not entirely
Hi Jeff,
On Thursday 14 May 2009 09:22:18 am Jeff Squyres wrote:
> Ralph -- did these messages come in due to the opal_attribute changes
> from last night?
They certainly are due to adding the __opal_attribute_format__ changes.
A similar patch as btl_tcp_frag should be applied...
Thanks,
Rainer
I'm not entirely sure as I'm unclear as to when this component would attempt
to build. I was building the latest trunk on a new (to me) system last night
(Jeff's cluster) when I saw the warnings.
Jeff: have you seen them before on your cluster?
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 7:22 AM, Jeff Squyres
On May 14, 2009, at 1:14 AM, Brad Penoff wrote:
At UBC, we are trying to find a new student who can maintain the SCTP
BTL. Unfortunately, it is has not been maintained since the progress
engine overhaul a while ago. At the moment, this is still on the TODO
list. I hope to get to this myself,
hey Ralph,
At UBC, we are trying to find a new student who can maintain the SCTP
BTL. Unfortunately, it is has not been maintained since the progress
engine overhaul a while ago. At the moment, this is still on the TODO
list. I hope to get to this myself, if no student is found.
It was my
Hi folks
Not sure who is maintaining the SCTP BTL, but I found the following
warnings when building tonight:
btl_sctp_frag.c: In function `mca_btl_sctp_frag_large_send':
btl_sctp_frag.c:179: warning: int format, different type arg (arg 3)
btl_sctp_frag.c:179: warning: int format, different
32 matches
Mail list logo