[hwloc-devel] Create success (hwloc r1.1a1r1958)

2010-04-19 Thread MPI Team
Creating nightly hwloc snapshot SVN tarball was a success. Snapshot: hwloc 1.1a1r1958 Start time: Mon Apr 19 21:01:02 EDT 2010 End time: Mon Apr 19 21:03:04 EDT 2010 Your friendly daemon, Cyrador

[OMPI devel] RFC: Calling BTL directly from PML

2010-04-19 Thread Rolf vandeVaart
WHAT: Change many of the functions on the PML layer to use the btl directly instead of going through the BML layer. [NOTE: I withdraw my earlier RFC from 04/07/2010 as it was flawed] WHY: Some PMLs (like the failover one I am working on) may add or delete BTLs while the program is running.

[OMPI devel] RFC: mpirun options

2010-04-19 Thread Eugene Loh
Jeff and I were talking about trac 2035 and the handling of mpirun command-line options. While most mpirun options have long, multi-character names prefixed with a double dash, OMPI had originally also wanted to support combinations of short names (e.g., "mpirun -hvq", even if we don't

Re: [OMPI devel] kernel 2.6.23 vs 2.6.24 - communication/wait times

2010-04-19 Thread Peter Kjellstrom
On Monday 19 April 2010, Oliver Geisler wrote: > > Ah, that could do it. Open MPI's shared memory files are under /tmp. So > > if /tmp is NFS, you could get extremely high latencies because of dirty > > page writes out through NFS. > > > > You don't necessarily have to make /tmp disk-full -- if

Re: [OMPI devel] kernel 2.6.23 vs 2.6.24 - communication/wait times

2010-04-19 Thread Eugene Loh
Ralph Castain wrote: On Apr 19, 2010, at 9:12 AM, Oliver Geisler wrote: Ah, that could do it. Open MPI's shared memory files are under /tmp. So if /tmp is NFS, you could get extremely high latencies because of dirty page writes out through NFS. You don't necessarily have

Re: [OMPI devel] 答复: 答复: Migrate the OpenMPI to VxWorks

2010-04-19 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* 张晶 wrote on Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 04:50:21PM CEST: > I think I should switch the host now in the windows to the linux ,or I will > have little chance to build the autotool, Thank you for your advice ! autotools work just fine under Windows. For example, Cygwin or MinGW ship pre-built autotools

Re: [OMPI devel] kernel 2.6.23 vs 2.6.24 - communication/wait times

2010-04-19 Thread Ralph Castain
On Apr 19, 2010, at 9:12 AM, Oliver Geisler wrote: > > >> Ah, that could do it. Open MPI's shared memory files are under /tmp. So if >> /tmp is NFS, you could get extremely high latencies because of dirty page >> writes out through NFS. >> >> You don't necessarily have to make /tmp

Re: [OMPI devel] kernel 2.6.23 vs 2.6.24 - communication/wait times

2010-04-19 Thread Oliver Geisler
> Ah, that could do it. Open MPI's shared memory files are under /tmp. So if > /tmp is NFS, you could get extremely high latencies because of dirty page > writes out through NFS. > > You don't necessarily have to make /tmp disk-full -- if you just make OMPI's > session directories go into