Re: [OMPI devel] OMPI and PRRTE separated

[Ralph H Castain]

FYI: I have deleted all the old OMPI tags from PRRTE, so we have a clean repo 
to work with now.


> On Dec 17, 2018, at 5:58 PM, Ralph H Castain  wrote:
> 
> Hello all
> 
> For those of you working with ORTE and/or PRRTE, GitHub has severed the 
> parent/child relationship between the OMPI and PRRTE repositories. Thus, we 
> will no longer be able to directly “pull” changes made to ORTE downstream 
> into PRRTE.
> 
> This marks the end of direct support for ORTE except in release branches as 
> people have time and inclination. We invite people to instead work in PRRTE 
> on any future-facing features.
> 
> The question of what to do about OPAL remains under discussion as a 
> much-reduced copy of it currently resides in PRRTE.
> Ralph
> 
> ___
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.open-mpi.org
> https://lists.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

___
devel mailing list
devel@lists.open-mpi.org
https://lists.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[OMPI devel] OMPI and PRRTE separated

[Ralph H Castain]

Hello all

For those of you working with ORTE and/or PRRTE, GitHub has severed the 
parent/child relationship between the OMPI and PRRTE repositories. Thus, we 
will no longer be able to directly “pull” changes made to ORTE downstream into 
PRRTE.

This marks the end of direct support for ORTE except in release branches as 
people have time and inclination. We invite people to instead work in PRRTE on 
any future-facing features.

The question of what to do about OPAL remains under discussion as a 
much-reduced copy of it currently resides in PRRTE.
Ralph

___
devel mailing list
devel@lists.open-mpi.org
https://lists.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [OMPI devel] Help needed debugging openmpi 3.1 builds for Fedora

[Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) via devel]

Orion --

Thanks for the bug report; I filed it here:

https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi/issues/6200


> On Dec 16, 2018, at 9:55 PM, Orion Poplawski  wrote:
> 
> On 12/15/18 1:13 PM, devel@lists.open-mpi.org wrote:
>> I'm testing out rebuilding Fedora packages with openmpi 3.1 in Fedora COPR:
>> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/scitech/openmpi3.1/builds/
>> A number of packages are failing running tests only on Fedora Rawhide x86_64 
>> with processes killed with signal 4 (Illegal instruction).  For example:
>> + 
>> PYTHONPATH=/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/mpi4py-3.0.0-6.git39ca78422646.fc30.x86_64/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/openmpi
>>  + mpiexec -n 1 python2 test/runtests.py -v --no-builddir 
>> --thread-level=serialized -e spawn
>> BUILDSTDERR: 
>> --
>> BUILDSTDERR: Primary job  terminated normally, but 1 process returned
>> BUILDSTDERR: a non-zero exit code. Per user-direction, the job has been 
>> aborted.
>> BUILDSTDERR: 
>> --
>> BUILDSTDERR: 
>> --
>> BUILDSTDERR: mpiexec noticed that process rank 0 with PID 0 on node 
>> 656ae442c6bf45fe9b45c5481f41bc45 exited on signal 4 (Illegal instruction).
>> BUILDSTDERR: 
>> --
>> Unfortunately I have been unable to reproduce this in any local mock builds. 
>>  So I'm left wondering if this is some kind of peculiarity with the COPR 
>> builders or if there is a real problem with openmpi.  Any suggestions for 
>> how to further debug this would be greatly appreciated.
>> (PID 0 seems very odd - that seems to be the same in the different failures)
>> - Orion
> 
> I believe I have tracked this down to the libpsm2 library.  If anyone here is 
> interested, I've filed a bug here:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1659852
> 
> -- 
> Orion Poplawski
> Manager of NWRA Technical Systems  720-772-5637
> NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702
> 3380 Mitchell Lane   or...@nwra.com
> Boulder, CO 80301 https://www.nwra.com/
> ___
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.open-mpi.org
> https://lists.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


-- 
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com

___
devel mailing list
devel@lists.open-mpi.org
https://lists.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo/devel