Paul,
from the logs, the only difference i see is about Fortran PROCEDURE.
openpmi 1.8 (svn checkout) does not build the usempif08 bindings if
PROCEDURE is not supported.
from the logs, openmpi 1.8.1 does not check whether PROCEDURE is
supported or not
here is the sample program to check
5-Illegal procedure interface - mpi_user_function (conftest.f90:
> 12) 0 inform, 0 warnings, 2 severes, 0 fatal for test_proc
> {hargrove@hopper04 OMPI}$ pgf90 -V pgf90 13.10-0 64-bit target on x86-64
> Linux -tp shanghai The Portland Group - PGI Compilers and Tools Copyright
> (c) 2013,
George,
#4815 is indirectly related to the move :
in bcol/basesmuma, we used to compare ompi_process_name_t, and now we
(try to)
compare an ompi_process_name_t and an opal_process_name_t (which causes
a glory SIGSEGV)
i proposed a temporary patch which is both broken and unelegant,
could you
Paul,
this is a fair point.
i commited r32354 in order to abort configure in this case
Cheers,
Gilles
On 2014/07/30 15:11, Paul Hargrove wrote:
> On a related topic:
>
> I configured with an explicit --enable-mpi-fortran=usempif08.
> Then configure found PROCEDURE was missing/broken.
> The
e/util/name_fns.c:522
>
>522 if (name1->jobid < name2->jobid) {
>
>(gdb) print name1
>
>$1 = (const orte_process_name_t *) 0x192350001
>
>(gdb) print *name1
>
>Cannot access memory at address 0x192350001
>
>(gdb) print name2
>
>$2 = (const orte_proce
't have a PGI compiler. I also didn't specify a level of Fortran
>support, but just had --enable-mpi-fortran
>
>Maybe we need to revert this commit until we figure out a better solution?
>
>On Jul 30, 2014, at 12:16 AM, Gilles Gouaillardet
><gilles.gouaillar...@iferc.org>
stead of a pointer to the name
>
> r32357
>
> On Jul 30, 2014, at 7:43 AM, Gilles GOUAILLARDET <
> gilles.gouaillar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Rolf,
>
> r32353 can be seen as a suspect...
> Even if it is correct, it might have exposed the bug discussed in #48
Paul and all,
For what it's worth, with openmpi 1.8.2rc2 and the intel fortran
compiler version 14.0.3.174 :
$ nm libmpi_usempif08.so| grep -i sizeof
there is no such undefined symbol (mpi_f08_sizeof_)
as a temporary workaround, did you try to force the linker use
Paul,
in .../ompi/mpi/fortran/use-mpi-f08, can you create the following dumb
test program,
compile and run nm | grep f08 on the object :
$ cat foo.f90
program foo
use mpi_f08_sizeof
implicit none
real :: x
integer :: size, ierror
call MPI_Sizeof_real_s_4(x, size, ierror)
stop
end program
Paul,
the ibm test suite from the non public ompi-tests repository has several
tests for usempif08.
Cheers,
Gilles
On 2014/08/01 11:04, Paul Hargrove wrote:
> Second related issue:
>
> Can/should examples/hello_usempif08.f90 be extended to use more of the
> module such that it would have
Paul,
As Ralph pointed, this issue was reported last month on the user mailing
list.
#include did not help :
http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/users/2014/07/24883.php
I will try if i can reproduce and fix this issue on a solaris10 (but x86) VM
BTW, are you using the GNU compiler ?
e Studio
> compilers are preferred.
> Let me know if you need me to try any of those gcc installations.
>
> -Paul
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Gilles Gouaillardet <
> gilles.gouaillar...@iferc.org> wrote:
>
>> Paul,
>>
>> As Ralph pointed
Paul and Ralph,
for what it's worth :
a) i faced the very same issue on my (slw) qemu emulated ppc64 vm
b) i was able to run very basic programs when passing --mca coll ^ml to
mpirun
Cheers,
Gilles
On 2014/08/01 12:30, Ralph Castain wrote:
> Yes, I fear this will require some effort to
pagesize = 65536; /* safer to overestimate than under */
> #endif
>
>
> opal_pagesize() anyone?
>
> -Paul
>
> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 12:50 AM, Gilles Gouaillardet <
> gilles.gouaillar...@iferc.org> wrote:
>
>> Paul,
>>
>> you are absolu
?
/* and then _process_name_jobid_for_opal, _process_name_vpid_for_opal,
opal_process_name_vpid_should_never_be_called
should also be updated */
Cheers,
Gilles
On 2014/08/01 19:52, Gilles Gouaillardet wrote:
> George and Ralph,
>
> i am very confused whether there is an issue or not.
>
>
> anyway, today Pa
Paul,
about the second point :
mmap is called with the MAP_FIXED flag, before the fix, the
required address was not aligned on a page size and hence
mmap failed.
the mmap failure was immediatly handled, but for some reasons
i did not fully investigate yet, this failure was not correctly
Paul,
imho, the root cause is a missing ampersand.
I will double check this from tomorrow only
Cheers,
Gilles
Ralph Castain wrote:
>Arg - that raises an interesting point. This is a pointer to a 64-bit number.
>Will uintptr_t resolve that problem on such platforms?
>
>
on both 32 and 64 bits arch in this case :
#if OPAL_ENABLE_DEBUG
static inline orte_process_name_t *
OMPI_CAST_RTE_NAME(opal_process_name_t * name);
#else
#define OMPI_CAST_RTE_NAME(a) ((orte_process_name_t*)(a))
#endif
Cheers,
Gilles
On 2014/08/03 14:49, Gilles GOUAILLARDET wrote:
> P
out 25% of the time
--mca btl scif,self => always hang
only the mpirun process remains and is hanging.
i will try to debug this, and i welcome any help !
Cheers,
Gilles
On 2014/08/04 11:57, Gilles Gouaillardet wrote:
> Paul,
>
> i confirm ampersand was missing and this was a bug
Fixed in r32409 : %d and %s were swapped in a MLERROR (printf like)
Gilles
On 2014/08/02 11:07, Gilles Gouaillardet wrote:
> Paul,
>
> about the second point :
> mmap is called with the MAP_FIXED flag, before the fix, the
> required address was not aligned on a page size and henc
Paul,
this is a bit trickier ...
on a Linux platform oshmem is built by default,
on a non Linux platform, oshmem is *not* built by default.
so the configure message (disabled by default) is correct on non Linux
platform, and incorrect on Linux platform ...
i do not know what should be done,
eing empty (bswap_64 or something).
>
> George.
>
> On Aug 1, 2014, at 06:52 , Gilles Gouaillardet
> <gilles.gouaillar...@iferc.org> wrote:
>
>> George and Ralph,
>>
>> i am very confused whether there is an issue or not.
>>
>>
>> anyway, t
from libopen-pal.la :
dependency_libs=' -lrdmacm -libverbs -lscif -lnuma -ldl -lrt -lnsl
-lutil -lm'
i confirm mpicc fails linking
but FWIT, using libtool does work (!)
could the bug come from the mpicc (and other) wrappers ?
Gilles
$ gcc -g -O0 -o hw /csc/home1/gouaillardet/hw.c
Here is a patch that has been minimally tested.
this is likely an overkill (at least when dynamic libraries can be used),
but it does the job so far ...
Cheers,
Gilles
On 2014/08/05 16:56, Gilles Gouaillardet wrote:
> from libopen-pal.la :
> dependency_libs=' -lrdmacm -libverbs -lscif
y speaking, converting a 64 bits to a big endian
>>> representation requires the swap of the 2 32 bits parts. So the correct
>>> approach would have been:
>>> uint64_t htonll(uint64_t v)
>>> {
>>> return uint64_t)ntohl(n)) << 32 | (uint64_t)ntoh
testing.
> Since I've determined already that 1.6.5 did not have the problem while
> 1.7.x does, the possibility exists that some smaller change might exist to
> restore what ever was lost between the v1.6 and v1.7 branches.
>
> -Paul
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 1:
Ralph and George,
here is attached a patch that fixes the heterogeneous support without
the abstraction violation.
Cheers,
Gilles
On 2014/08/06 9:40, Gilles Gouaillardet wrote:
> hummm
>
> i intentionally did not swap the two 32 bits (!)
>
> from the top level, what we have i
to the POSIX prototype (aka. returning the changes value
>> instead of doing things inplace).
>>
>> George.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 7:02 AM, Gilles Gouaillardet
>> <gilles.gouaillar...@iferc.org> wrote:
>> Ralph and George,
Ralph and all,
> * static linking failure - Gilles has posted a proposed fix, but somebody
> needs to approve and CMR it. Please see:
> https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/4834
Jeff made a better fix (r32447) to which i added a minor correction
(r32448).
as far as i am concerned,
Kawashima-san,
This is interesting :-)
proc is in the stack and has type orte_process_name_t
with
typedef uint32_t orte_jobid_t;
typedef uint32_t orte_vpid_t;
struct orte_process_name_t {
orte_jobid_t jobid; /**< Job number */
orte_vpid_t vpid; /**< Process id - equivalent to
as an ORTE_NAME the issue will go away.
>
> George.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 1:04 AM, Gilles Gouaillardet <
> gilles.gouaillar...@iferc.org> wrote:
>
>> Kawashima-san and all,
>>
>> Here is attached a one off patch for v1.8.
>> /* it does
Folks,
here is the description of a hang i briefly mentionned a few days ago.
with the trunk (i did not check 1.8 ...) simply run on one node :
mpirun -np 2 --mca btl sm,self ./abort
(the abort test is taken from the ibm test suite : process 0 call
MPI_Abort while process 1 enters an infinite
r_finalize in the first place
(which is sufficient but might not be necessary ...)
Cheers,
Gilles
On 2014/08/09 1:27, Ralph Castain wrote:
> Committed a fix for this in r32460 - see if I got it!
>
> On Aug 8, 2014, at 4:02 AM, Gilles Gouaillardet
> <gilles.gouaillar...@iferc.org> w
Jeff and all,
i fixed the trivial errors in the trunk, there are now 11 non trivial
errors.
(commits r32490 to r32497)
i ran the script vs the v1.8 branch and found 54 errors
(first, you need to
touch Makefile.ompi-rules
in the top-level Open MPI directory in order to make the script happy)
Folks,
i noticed mpirun (trunk) hangs when running any mpi program on two nodes
*and* each node has a private network with the same ip
(in my case, each node has a private network to a MIC)
in order to reproduce the problem, you can simply run (as root) on the
two compute nodes
brctl addbr br0
Thanks Christopher,
this has been fixed in the trunk with r32520
Cheers,
Gilles
On 2014/08/13 14:49, Christopher Samuel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We spotted this in 1.6.5 and git grep shows it's fixed in the
> v1.8 branch but in master it's still there:
>
>
Lenny,
that looks related to #4857 which has been fixed in trunk since r32517
could you please update your openmpi library and try again ?
Gilles
On 2014/08/13 17:00, Lenny Verkhovsky wrote:
> Following Jeff's suggestion adding devel mailing list.
>
> Hi All,
> I am currently facing strange
Josh, Paul,
the problem with old PGI compilers comes from the preprocessor (!)
with pgi 12.10 :
oshmem/shmem/fortran/start_pes_f.c
SHMEM_GENERATE_WEAK_BINDINGS(START_PES, start_pes)
gets expanded as
#pragma weak START_PES = PSTART_PES SHMEM_GENERATE_WEAK_PRAGMA ( weak
start_pes_ = pstart_pes_
In the case of PGI compilers prior to 13, a workaround is to configure
with --disable-oshmem-profile
On 2014/08/18 16:21, Gilles Gouaillardet wrote:
> Josh, Paul,
>
> the problem with old PGI compilers comes from the preprocessor (!)
>
> with pgi 12.10 :
> oshmem/shmem/for
r32551 now detects this limitation and automatically disable oshmem profile. I
am now revamping the patch for v1.8
Gilles
Gilles Gouaillardet <gilles.gouaillar...@iferc.org> wrote:
>In the case of PGI compilers prior to 13, a workaround is to configure with
>--disable-oshmem-profil
Folks,
let's look at the following trivial test program :
#include
#include
int main (int argc, char * argv[]) {
int rank, size;
MPI_Init(, );
MPI_Comm_size(MPI_COMM_WORLD, );
MPI_Comm_rank(MPI_COMM_WORLD, );
printf ("I am %d/%d and i abort\n", rank, size);
t; -Nathan
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 10:48:48PM -0400, svn-commit-mai...@open-mpi.org
>> wrote:
>>> Author: ggouaillardet (Gilles Gouaillardet)
>>> Date: 2014-08-19 22:48:47 EDT (Tue, 19 Aug 2014)
>>> New Revision: 32555
>>> URL: ht
he struct in order to preserve the old behaviour.
>
> Ashley.
>
> On 21 Aug 2014, at 04:31, Gilles Gouaillardet <gilles.gouaillar...@iferc.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Paul,
>>
>> the piece of code that causes an issue with PGI 2013 and older is just a bit
>> mor
;
whereas your mpi_no_op.c return 0;
Cheers,
Gilles
Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote:
>You might want to try again with current head of trunk as something seems off
>in what you are seeing - more below
>
>
>
>On Aug 22, 2014, at 3:12 AM, Gilles Gouaillardet
><
ass for me
>
>
> On Aug 22, 2014, at 9:12 AM, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote:
>
>> On Aug 22, 2014, at 9:06 AM, Gilles Gouaillardet
>> <gilles.gouaillar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Ralph,
>>>
>>> Will do on Monday
&g
Folks,
when i run
mpirun -np 1 ./intercomm_create
from the ibm test suite, it either :
- success
- hangs
- mpirun crashes (SIGSEGV) soon after writing the following message
ORTE_ERROR_LOG: Not found in file
../../../src/ompi-trunk/orte/orted/pmix/pmix_server.c at line 566
here is what happens :
gt;look at that signature to ensure we aren't getting it confused.
>
>On Aug 25, 2014, at 1:59 AM, Gilles Gouaillardet
><gilles.gouaillar...@iferc.org> wrote:
>
>> Folks,
>>
>> when i run
>> mpirun -np 1 ./intercomm_create
>> from the ibm test
Folks,
the test_shmem_zero_get.x from the openshmem-release-1.0d test suite is
currently failing.
i looked at the test itself, and compared it to test_shmem_zero_put.x
(that is a success) and
i am very puzzled ...
the test calls several flavors of shmem_*_get where :
- the destination is in the
Folks,
i just commited r32604 in order to fix compilation (pmix) when ompi is
configured with --without-hwloc
now, even a trivial hello world program issues the following output
(which is a non fatal, and could even be reported as a warning) :
Folks,
the intercomm_create test case from the ibm test suite can hang under
some configuration.
basically, it will spawn n tasks in a first communicator, and then n
tasks in a second communicator.
when i run from node0 :
mpirun -np 1 --mca btl tcp,self --mca coll ^ml -host node1,node2
Thanks Ralph !
Cheers,
Gilles
On 2014/08/28 4:52, Ralph Castain wrote:
> Took me awhile to track this down, but it is now fixed - combination of
> several minor errors
>
> Thanks
> Ralph
>
> On Aug 27, 2014, at 4:07 AM, Gilles Gouaillardet
> <gilles.gouaillar...@i
Howard and Edgar,
i fixed a few bugs (r32639 and r32642)
the bug is trivial to reproduce with any mpi hello world program
mpirun -np 2 --mca btl openib,self hello_world
after setting the mca param in the $HOME/.openmpi/mca-params.conf
$ cat ~/.openmpi/mca-params.conf
btl_openib_receive_queues
Ralph and all,
The following trivial test hangs
/* it hangs at least 99% of the time in my environment, 1% is a race
condition and the program behaves as expected */
mpirun -np 1 --mca btl self /bin/false
same behaviour happen with the following trivial but MPI program :
#include
int main
original problem that was trying to be
> addressed.
>
>
> On Aug 28, 2014, at 10:01 PM, Gilles Gouaillardet
> <gilles.gouaillar...@iferc.org> wrote:
>
>> Howard and Edgar,
>>
>> i fixed a few bugs (r32639 and r32642)
>>
>> the bug is trivial
Mishima-san,
the root cause is macro expansion does not always occur as one would
have expected ...
could you please give a try to the attached patch ?
it compiles (at least with gcc) and i made zero tests so far
Cheers,
Gilles
On 2014/09/01 10:44, tmish...@jcity.maeda.co.jp wrote:
> Hi
, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
> Gilles --
>
> Did you get a reply about this?
>
>
> On Aug 26, 2014, at 3:17 AM, Gilles Gouaillardet
> <gilles.gouaillar...@iferc.org> wrote:
>
>> Folks,
>>
>> the test_shmem_zero_get.x from the openshmem-release-
Folks,
mtt recently failed a bunch of times with the trunk.
a good suspect is the collective/ibarrier test from the ibm test suite.
most of the time, CHECK_AND_RECYCLE will fail
/* IS_COLL_SYNCMEM(coll_op) is true */
with this test case, we just get a glory SIGSEGV since OBJ_RELEASE is
called
ion of the coll/ml locality requirement.
>
>Did this patch "fix" the problem by avoiding the segfault due to coll/ml
>disqualifying itself? Or did it make everything work okay again?
>
>
>On Sep 1, 2014, at 3:16 AM, Gilles Gouaillardet
><gilles.gouaillar...@iferc.org>
Folks,
when OpenMPI is configured with --disable-weak-symbols and a fortran
2008 capable compiler (e.g. gcc 4.9),
MPI_STATUSES_IGNORE invoked from Fortran is not correctly interpreted as
it should.
/* instead of being a special array of statuses, it is an array of one
status, which can lead to
Ralph and Brice,
i noted Ralph commited r32685 in order to fix a problem with Intel
compilers.
The very similar issue occurs with clang 3.2 (gcc and clang 3.4 are ok
for me)
imho, the root cause is in the hwloc configure.
in this case, configure fails to detect strncasecmp is part of the C
l I can say is that
> "tolower" on my CentOS box is defined in , and that has to be
> included in the misc.h header.
>
>
> On Sep 8, 2014, at 5:49 PM, Gilles Gouaillardet
> <gilles.gouaillar...@iferc.org> wrote:
>
>> Ralph and Brice,
>>
>&g
Folks,
Since r32672 (trunk), grpcomm/rcd is the default module.
the attached spawn.c test program is a trimmed version of the
spawn_with_env_vars.c test case
from the ibm test suite.
when invoked on two nodes :
- the program hangs with -np 2
- the program can crash with np > 2
error message is
ggouaillardet -> ggouaillardet
On 2014/09/10 19:46, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
> As the next step of the planned migration to Github, I need to know:
>
> - Your Github ID (so that you can be added to the new OMPI git repo)
> - Your SVN ID (so that I can map SVN->Github IDs, and therefore map
and for each of them to establish a
>> persistent receive. They then can use the signature to tell which collective
>> the incoming message belongs to.
>>
>> I'll fix it, but it won't be until tomorrow I'm afraid as today is shot.
>>
>>
>> On Sep 9, 2014
ely not the right fix, it was very lightly
tested, but so far, it works for me ...
Cheers,
Gilles
On 2014/09/11 16:11, Gilles Gouaillardet wrote:
> Ralph,
>
> things got worst indeed :-(
>
> now a simple hello world involving two hosts hang in mpi_init.
> there is still a race conditio
, 2014, at 4:02 AM, Gilles Gouaillardet
> <gilles.gouaillar...@iferc.org> wrote:
>
>> Ralph,
>>
>> the root cause is when the second orted/mpirun runs rcd_finalize_coll,
>> it does not invoke pmix_server_release
>> because allgather_stub was not previou
and 3 enter the allgather at the send time, they will sent a
message to each other at the same time and rml fails establishing the
connection. i could not find whether this is linked to my changes...
Cheers,
Gilles
>
> On Sep 11, 2014, at 5:23 PM, Gilles Gouaillardet <
> gilles.gouai
Howard, and Rolf,
i initially reported the issue at
http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2014/09/15767.php
r32659 is not a fix nor a regression, it simply aborts instead of
OBJ_RELEASE(mpi_comm_world).
/* my point here is we should focus on the root cause and not the
consequence */
Ralph,
here is the full description of a race condition in oob/tcp i very briefly
mentionned in a previous post :
the race condition can occur when two not connected orted try to send a
message to each other for the first time and at the same time.
that can occur when running mpi helloworld on
then have the higher vpid retry while the lower one waits.
> The logic for that was still in place, but it looks like you are hitting a
> different code path, and I found another potential one as well. So I think I
> plugged the holes, but will wait to hear if you confirm.
>
t triggers it so I
> can continue debugging
>
> Ralph
>
> On Sep 17, 2014, at 4:07 AM, Gilles Gouaillardet
> <gilles.gouaillar...@iferc.org> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Ralph,
>>
>> this is much better but there is still a bug :
>> with the very same scen
Folks,
for both trunk and v1.8 branch, configure takes the --with-threads option.
valid usages are
--with-threads, --with-threads=yes, --with-threads=posix and
--with-threads=no
/* v1.6 used to support the --with-threads=solaris */
if we try to configure with --with-threads=no, this will result
Folks,
r32716 broke v1.8 :-(
the root cause it it included MCA_BASE_VAR_TYPE_VERSION_STRING which has
not yet landed into v1.8
the attached trivial patch fixes this issue
Can the RM/GK please review it and apply it ?
Cheers,
Gilles
Index: opal/mca/base/mca_base_var.c
moved from
MCA_OOB_TCP_CONNECT_ACK to MCA_OOB_TCP_CLOSED,
retry() should have been invoked ?
Cheers,
Gilles
On 2014/09/18 17:02, Ralph Castain wrote:
> The patch looks fine to me - please go ahead and apply it. Thanks!
>
> On Sep 17, 2014, at 11:35 PM, Gilles Gouaillardet
> <gilles.goua
Thanks for the pointer George !
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 5:46 AM, George Bosilca wrote:
> Or copy the handshake protocol design of the TCP BTL...
>
>
the main difference between oob/tcp and btl/tcp is the way we resolve the
situation in which two processes send their first
o ahead, and thanks
>
> On Sep 20, 2014, at 10:26 PM, Gilles Gouaillardet <
> gilles.gouaillar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the pointer George !
>
> On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 5:46 AM, George Bosilca <bosi...@icl.utk.edu>
> wrote:
>
>> Or copy the han
Folks,
if i read between the lines, it looks like the next stable branch will be
v2.0 and not v1.10
is there a strong reason for that (such as ABI compatibility will break, or
a major but internal refactoring) ?
/* other than v1.10 is less than v1.8 when comparing strings :-) */
Cheers,
Gilles
my 0.02 US$ ...
Bitbucket pricing model is per user (but with free public/private
repository up to 5 users)
whereas github pricing is per *private* repository (and free public
repository and with unlimited users)
from an OpenMPI point of view, this means :
- with github, only the private
dition vis 1.8 - I agree it
> is not a blocker for that release.
>
> Ralph
>
> On Sep 22, 2014, at 4:49 PM, Gilles Gouaillardet
> <gilles.gouaillar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Ralph,
>>
>> here is the patch i am using so far.
>> i will res
Nathan,
why not just make the topology information available at that point as
you described it ?
the attached patch does this, could you please review it ?
Cheers,
Gilles
On 2014/09/26 2:50, Nathan Hjelm wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 07:03:24PM +0300, Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
>> I finally
oiding changing
> anything in topo for 1.8.
>
> -Nathan
>
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 08:02:41PM +0900, Gilles Gouaillardet wrote:
>>Nathan,
>>
>>why not just make the topology information available at that point as you
>>described it ?
>>
&
Folks,
the dynamic/spawn test from the ibm test suite crashes if the openib btl
is detected
(the test can be ran on one node with an IB port)
here is what happens :
in mca_btl_openib_proc_create,
the macro
OPAL_MODEX_RECV(rc, _btl_openib_component.super.btl_version,
Thanks Ralph !
it did fix the problem
Cheers,
Gilles
On 2014/10/01 3:04, Ralph Castain wrote:
> I fixed this in r32818 - the components shouldn't be passing back success if
> the requested info isn't found. Hope that fixes the problem.
>
>
> On Sep 30, 2014, at 1:54 AM, Gill
tive
>> selection time for either graph or dist graph.
>>
>> -Nathan
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 02:03:27PM +0900, Gilles Gouaillardet wrote:
>>> Nathan,
>>>
>>> here is a revision of the previously attached patch, and that supports
&
Hi Jeff,
thumbs up for the migration !
the names here are the CMR owners ('Owned by' field in TRAC)
should it be the duty of the creators ('Reported by' field in TRAC) to
re-create the CMR instead?
/* if not, and from a git log point of view, that means the commiter
will be the reviewer and not
e those CMRs as pull requests; probably in some
>> cases it's the reporter, probably in some cases it's the owner. :-)
>>
>>
>> On Oct 2, 2014, at 6:33 AM, Gilles Gouaillardet
>> <gilles.gouaillar...@iferc.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Jeff,
>&g
Jeff,
i could not find how to apply a label to a PR via the web interface (and
i am not sure i can even do that since authority might be required)
any idea (maybe a special keyword in the comment ...) ?
Cheers,
Gilles
On 2014/10/03 1:53, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
> On Oct 2, 2014, at
lestone, and assign the PR to someone,
> *after* you create the PR (same with creating issues).
>
> See https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi/wiki/SubmittingBugs for details:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Oct 2, 2014, at 11:37 PM, Gilles Gouaillardet <
> gilles.gouaillar...@iferc.or
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) <jsquy...@cisco.com>
wrote:
> On Oct 2, 2014, at 11:33 PM, Gilles Gouaillardet <
> gilles.gouaillar...@iferc.org> wrote:
>
> > the most painful part is probably to manually retrieve the git commit id
> > of
ignees.
>
>All the OMPI devs have *read* access to ompi-release, meaning you can
>create/comment on issues, but not set labels/milestones/assignees.
>
>I did not expect this behavior. Grumble. Will have to think about it a bit...
>
>
>
>
>On Oct 3, 2014, at 7:07 AM, Gi
will do !
Gilles
"Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)" <jsquy...@cisco.com> wrote:
>That's a possibility. IU could probably host this for us.
>
>Would you mind looking into how hard this would be?
>
>
>On Oct 3, 2014, at 8:41 AM, Gilles Gouaillardet
><gilles.
Folks,
currently, https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi last commit was 13 days ago
(see attached snapshot)
this is not the most up to date state !
for example, the last commit of my clone is
commit 54c839a970fc3025a08fe1c04b7d4b9767078264
Merge: dee6b63 5c5453b
Author: Gilles Gouaillardet
ant option,
there are some more political implications (who
manage/update/monitor/secure this).
the second option (cron script) could be accepted more easily by IU.
i will experiment on my sandbox from now.
Cheers,
Gilles
On 2014/10/03 22:20, Gilles Gouaillardet wrote:
> will do !
>
> Gille
sandbox from now.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Gilles
>
> On 2014/10/03 22:20, Gilles Gouaillardet wrote:
>> will do !
>>
>> Gilles
>>
>> "Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)" <jsquy...@cisco.com> wrote:
>>> That's a possibility. IU could
wrote:
> On Oct 7, 2014, at 6:57 AM, Gilles Gouaillardet <
> gilles.gouaillar...@iferc.org> wrote:
>
> > so far, using webhooks looks really simple :-)
>
> Good!
>
> > a public web server (apache+php) that can
> > a) process json requests
> > b)
ose revisions listed above that are new to this repository have
>> not appeared on any other notification email; so we list those
>> revisions in full, below.
>>
>> - Log -----
>> https://github.com/open-
Ralph,
let me quickly reply about this one :
On 2014/10/16 12:00, Ralph Castain wrote:
> I also don't understand some of the changes in this commit. For example, why
> did you replace the OPAL_MODEX_SEND_STRING macro with essentially a
> hard-coded replica of that macro?
OPAL_MODEX_SEND_STRING
OK, revert done :
commit b5aea782cec116af095a7e7a7310e9e2a018
Author: Gilles Gouaillardet <gilles.gouaillar...@iferc.org>
List-Post: devel@lists.open-mpi.org
Date: Thu Oct 16 12:24:38 2014 +0900
Revert "Fix heterogeneous support"
Per the discussion at
http://
9b9
Author: Gilles Gouaillardet <gilles.gouaillar...@iferc.org>
List-Post: devel@lists.open-mpi.org
Date: Thu Oct 16 13:29:32 2014 +0900
pmi/s1: fix large keys
do not overwrite the PMI key when pushing a message that does
not fit within 255 bytes
diff --git a/opal/mca/pmix/base/p
Artem,
There is a known issue #235 with modex and i made PR #238 with a tentative fix.
Could you please give it a try and reports if it solves your problem ?
Cheers
Gilles
Artem Polyakov wrote:
>Hello, I have troubles with latest trunk if I use PMI1.
>
>
>For example, if
1 - 100 of 758 matches
Mail list logo