ii-ompi-trunk/examples'
make[2]: Entering directory
`/hpc/home/USERS/ivanovi/prj/ii-ompi-trunk/examples'
shmemcc -g ring_oshmem_c.c -o ring_oshmem
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/hpc/home/USERS/ivanovi/prj/ii-ompi-trunk/examples'
make[2]: Entering directory
`/hpc/home/USERS/i
Hi Ralph,
This PR as https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi/pull/1154 should resolve it
Igor
On 27.11.2015 8:30, Ralph Castain wrote:
Hi folks
With the latest version of the master, I am getting a flood of warnings that
look like this:
pshmem_put.c:97:29: warning: ISO C99 requires rest arguments
Hi Jeff,
Is there naming convention related configure options in OMPI?
Do you see any objections about --enable-oshmem-xxx or they must be
replaced with --enable-shmem-xxx?
Regards,
Igor
On 17.10.2013 14:20, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
Mellanox --
In r29448, you deleted the comment
,
Cray`s etc products.
SIte www.shmem.org says that "The SHMEM™ Application Programming
Interface (API) definition and the SHMEM trademark are the property of
SGI. "
Igor
On 18.10.2013 16:33, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
On Oct 18, 2013, at 1:18 AM, Igor Ivanov wrote:
Is th
Hi Jeff,
I would like to add few notes inline
Igor
On 25.10.2013 20:33, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
We had a few emails a little while ago, and decided that the branding should be
"oshmem" because Open SHMEM is different than (original) SHMEM.
I notice that there's st
iable, try destroy using non accessed address;
So a code that is under discussion fixes step 6.
Igor
On 03.12.2013 23:01, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
I don't think there is one -- you'll need to print it from the debugger.
On Dec 3, 2013, at 1:38 PM, Mike Dubman wrote:
tha
On 04.12.2013 17:56, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
On Dec 4, 2013, at 2:52 AM, Igor Ivanov wrote:
It is the first mca variable with type as string from btl/openib as
'device_param_files'. Actually you can disable it and get failure on the second.
Description of case we see:
1.
Brian,
Could you look at patch based on your suggestion. It resolves the issue
with mca variable.
Igor
On 18.12.2013 01:48, Barrett, Brian W wrote:
The proposed solution at the bottom is wrong. There aren't two different
BMLs, there's one, and it lives in OMPI.
The solution is t
.)
Igor
On 03.01.2014 00:04, Barrett, Brian W wrote:
Igor -
Sorry for the slow reply; I was on vacation for the last week and a half.
The patch doesn't look quite right to me. If the cm PML is used, the spml
(or something else in the OSHMEM layer) is going to have to call add_procs
on the B
ll missing something?
Igor
On 16.01.2014 22:21, Barrett, Brian W wrote:
If a process is using the Portals 4 MTL and calls shmem_init, the BTLS
will be initialized properly, but as of right now, no one will call
add_procs() on the BML (which calls add_procs() on the BTLs). So the
first shmem com
10 matches
Mail list logo
