Re: [OMPI devel] 1.7.4rc2r30168 - PGI F08 failure

2014-01-10 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
Yes, I'm pretty sure we've seen that before, and it was ID'ed as either a local configuration issue or a PGI bug. On Jan 10, 2014, at 7:51 PM, Paul Hargrove wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Paul Hargrove wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 10,

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.7.4rc2r30168 - PGI F08 failure

2014-01-10 Thread Paul Hargrove
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Paul Hargrove wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) < > jsquy...@cisco.com> wrote: > >> Don't worry about PGI 11. I'm happy enough knowing that PGI 12 works. > > > Test is already running to satisfy my own

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.7.4rc2r30168 - PGI F08 failure

2014-01-10 Thread Paul Hargrove
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote: > Don't worry about PGI 11. I'm happy enough knowing that PGI 12 works. Test is already running to satisfy my own curiosity. But I'll only post the result if something fails. -Paul -- Paul H. Hargrove

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.7.4rc2r30168 - PGI F08 failure

2014-01-10 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
Don't worry about PGI 11. I'm happy enough knowing that PGI 12 works. On Jan 10, 2014, at 6:59 PM, Paul Hargrove wrote: > Jeff, > > I said earlier that PGI *12* has build mpi_f08 correctly in response to Larry > baker asking about 11 and 12. > I don't have a PGI 11 config

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.7.4rc2r30168 - PGI F08 failure

2014-01-10 Thread Paul Hargrove
Jeff, I said earlier that PGI *12* has build mpi_f08 correctly in response to Larry baker asking about 11 and 12. I don't have a PGI 11 config on my list at the moment, but would be surprised if I can't find one. I will look for a PGI 11, but am focused on the opal_path_nfs() stuff at the moment.

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.7.4rc2r30168 - PGI F08 failure

2014-01-10 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
On Jan 10, 2014, at 6:45 PM, Paul Hargrove wrote: > Keep in mind that I have no specific reason to think pgi-10 should be > accepted for building mpi_f08. > My only observation was that it seemed to be rejected w/ less configure > testing than was applied to accept 8.0 and

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.7.4rc2r30168 - PGI F08 failure

2014-01-10 Thread Paul Hargrove
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote: > Can you send the output from pgi-10? We don't reject based on compiler > name/version -- it should be all behavior-based checks... Attached. Keep in mind that I have no specific reason to think pgi-10

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.7.4rc2r30168 - PGI F08 failure

2014-01-10 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
On Jan 10, 2014, at 1:26 PM, Paul Hargrove wrote: > OMPI's configure says pgi-8.0 and pgi-9.0 are "good". > But pgi-10.0 is rejected without even subjecting it to the tests. > This situation (8.0 and 9.0 "better" than 10.0) sounds fishy to me. That's true. Can you send the

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.7.4rc2r30168 - PGI F08 failure

2014-01-10 Thread Paul Hargrove
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 7:49 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote: > Paul -- > > The output from configure looks ok to me. We're testing for the various > capabilities of the fortran compiler that we need, most of which have been > around for quite a while. One Big New Thing

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.7.4rc2r30168 - PGI F08 failure

2014-01-10 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
Paul -- The output from configure looks ok to me. We're testing for the various capabilities of the fortran compiler that we need, most of which have been around for quite a while. One Big New Thing that isn't around yet is the type(*), dimension(..) notation, which no fortran compiler

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.7.4rc2r30168 - PGI F08 failure

2014-01-09 Thread Paul Hargrove
Larry, I didn't try pgi-11, but pgi-12.8 *does* have F08 support detected by OpenMPI: $ openmpi-1.7-latest-linux-x86_64-pgi-12.8/INST/bin/ompi_info --all | grep -i f08 Fort use mpi_f08: yes Fort mpi_f08 compliance: The mpi_f08 module is available, but due to limitations in the pgf90

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.7.4rc2r30168 - PGI F08 failure

2014-01-09 Thread Larry Baker
I wonder if the reason PGI V10.x does not use mpi_f08 bindings is that old PGI compiler version number parsing error. (Unless, of course, if PGI V11.x or V12.x do use mpi_f08 bindings.) In that old (autoconf?) bug, decisions were made about features supported on PGI compilers by parsing the

[OMPI devel] 1.7.4rc2r30168 - PGI F08 failure

2014-01-09 Thread Paul Hargrove
My attempts to build the current 1.7.4rc tarball with versions 8.0 and 9.0 of the Portland Group compilers fails miserably on compilation of mpi-f08-types.F90. I am sort of surprised by the attempt to build Fortran 2008 support w/ such old compilers. I think that fact itself is the real bug here,