Re: [OMPI devel] SCTP BTL exclusivity value problem
I just read this thread... many thanks for applying the fix. Jeff Squyres wrote: > Done in r16942. > > On Dec 12, 2007, at 10:45 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 10:31:37AM -0500, Jeff Squyres wrote: >>> I'd be in favor of setting the TCP exclusivity to LOW+100 and setting >>> SCTP exclusivity to LOW. >> Fine with me. >> >>> >>> On Dec 12, 2007, at 10:07 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote: >>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 10:02:07AM -0500, Jeff Squyres wrote: > Yes -- this came up in a prior thread. See what I proposed: > >http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2007/12/2698.php > > (no one replied, so no action was taken) > > Are you on a system where the SCTP BTL is being built? What kind > of > environment is it? Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4 (Nahant Update 5) # rpm -qa | grep sctp lksctp-tools-devel-1.0.2-6.4E.1 lksctp-tools-doc-1.0.2-6.4E.1 lksctp-tools-1.0.2-6.4E.1 > > > On Dec 12, 2007, at 9:38 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> SCTP BTL sets its exclusivity value to MCA_BTL_EXCLUSIVITY_LOW - 1 >> but MCA_BTL_EXCLUSIVITY_LOW is zero so actually it is set to max >> exclusivity possible. Can somebody fix this please? May be we >> should >> not >> define MCA_BTL_EXCLUSIVITY_LOW to zero? >> >> -- >> Gleb. >> ___ >> devel mailing list >> de...@open-mpi.org >> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel > > -- > Jeff Squyres > Cisco Systems > ___ > devel mailing list > de...@open-mpi.org > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel -- Gleb. ___ devel mailing list de...@open-mpi.org http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel >>> >>> -- >>> Jeff Squyres >>> Cisco Systems >>> ___ >>> devel mailing list >>> de...@open-mpi.org >>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel >> -- >> Gleb. >> ___ >> devel mailing list >> de...@open-mpi.org >> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel > > -- Karol Mroz km...@cs.ubc.ca
Re: [OMPI devel] SCTP BTL exclusivity value problem
Done in r16942. On Dec 12, 2007, at 10:45 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote: On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 10:31:37AM -0500, Jeff Squyres wrote: I'd be in favor of setting the TCP exclusivity to LOW+100 and setting SCTP exclusivity to LOW. Fine with me. On Dec 12, 2007, at 10:07 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote: On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 10:02:07AM -0500, Jeff Squyres wrote: Yes -- this came up in a prior thread. See what I proposed: http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2007/12/2698.php (no one replied, so no action was taken) Are you on a system where the SCTP BTL is being built? What kind of environment is it? Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4 (Nahant Update 5) # rpm -qa | grep sctp lksctp-tools-devel-1.0.2-6.4E.1 lksctp-tools-doc-1.0.2-6.4E.1 lksctp-tools-1.0.2-6.4E.1 On Dec 12, 2007, at 9:38 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote: Hi, SCTP BTL sets its exclusivity value to MCA_BTL_EXCLUSIVITY_LOW - 1 but MCA_BTL_EXCLUSIVITY_LOW is zero so actually it is set to max exclusivity possible. Can somebody fix this please? May be we should not define MCA_BTL_EXCLUSIVITY_LOW to zero? -- Gleb. ___ devel mailing list de...@open-mpi.org http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel -- Jeff Squyres Cisco Systems ___ devel mailing list de...@open-mpi.org http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel -- Gleb. ___ devel mailing list de...@open-mpi.org http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel -- Jeff Squyres Cisco Systems ___ devel mailing list de...@open-mpi.org http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel -- Gleb. ___ devel mailing list de...@open-mpi.org http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel -- Jeff Squyres Cisco Systems
Re: [OMPI devel] SCTP BTL exclusivity value problem
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 10:31:37AM -0500, Jeff Squyres wrote: > I'd be in favor of setting the TCP exclusivity to LOW+100 and setting > SCTP exclusivity to LOW. Fine with me. > > > On Dec 12, 2007, at 10:07 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 10:02:07AM -0500, Jeff Squyres wrote: > >> Yes -- this came up in a prior thread. See what I proposed: > >> > >> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2007/12/2698.php > >> > >> (no one replied, so no action was taken) > >> > >> Are you on a system where the SCTP BTL is being built? What kind of > >> environment is it? > > Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4 (Nahant Update 5) > > > > # rpm -qa | grep sctp > > lksctp-tools-devel-1.0.2-6.4E.1 > > lksctp-tools-doc-1.0.2-6.4E.1 > > lksctp-tools-1.0.2-6.4E.1 > > > >> > >> > >> > >> On Dec 12, 2007, at 9:38 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> SCTP BTL sets its exclusivity value to MCA_BTL_EXCLUSIVITY_LOW - 1 > >>> but MCA_BTL_EXCLUSIVITY_LOW is zero so actually it is set to max > >>> exclusivity possible. Can somebody fix this please? May be we should > >>> not > >>> define MCA_BTL_EXCLUSIVITY_LOW to zero? > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Gleb. > >>> ___ > >>> devel mailing list > >>> de...@open-mpi.org > >>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Jeff Squyres > >> Cisco Systems > >> ___ > >> devel mailing list > >> de...@open-mpi.org > >> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel > > > > -- > > Gleb. > > ___ > > devel mailing list > > de...@open-mpi.org > > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel > > > -- > Jeff Squyres > Cisco Systems > ___ > devel mailing list > de...@open-mpi.org > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel -- Gleb.
Re: [OMPI devel] SCTP BTL exclusivity value problem
I'd be in favor of setting the TCP exclusivity to LOW+100 and setting SCTP exclusivity to LOW. On Dec 12, 2007, at 10:07 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote: On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 10:02:07AM -0500, Jeff Squyres wrote: Yes -- this came up in a prior thread. See what I proposed: http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2007/12/2698.php (no one replied, so no action was taken) Are you on a system where the SCTP BTL is being built? What kind of environment is it? Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4 (Nahant Update 5) # rpm -qa | grep sctp lksctp-tools-devel-1.0.2-6.4E.1 lksctp-tools-doc-1.0.2-6.4E.1 lksctp-tools-1.0.2-6.4E.1 On Dec 12, 2007, at 9:38 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote: Hi, SCTP BTL sets its exclusivity value to MCA_BTL_EXCLUSIVITY_LOW - 1 but MCA_BTL_EXCLUSIVITY_LOW is zero so actually it is set to max exclusivity possible. Can somebody fix this please? May be we should not define MCA_BTL_EXCLUSIVITY_LOW to zero? -- Gleb. ___ devel mailing list de...@open-mpi.org http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel -- Jeff Squyres Cisco Systems ___ devel mailing list de...@open-mpi.org http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel -- Gleb. ___ devel mailing list de...@open-mpi.org http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel -- Jeff Squyres Cisco Systems
Re: [OMPI devel] SCTP BTL exclusivity value problem
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 10:02:07AM -0500, Jeff Squyres wrote: > Yes -- this came up in a prior thread. See what I proposed: > > http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2007/12/2698.php > > (no one replied, so no action was taken) > > Are you on a system where the SCTP BTL is being built? What kind of > environment is it? Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4 (Nahant Update 5) # rpm -qa | grep sctp lksctp-tools-devel-1.0.2-6.4E.1 lksctp-tools-doc-1.0.2-6.4E.1 lksctp-tools-1.0.2-6.4E.1 > > > > On Dec 12, 2007, at 9:38 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > SCTP BTL sets its exclusivity value to MCA_BTL_EXCLUSIVITY_LOW - 1 > > but MCA_BTL_EXCLUSIVITY_LOW is zero so actually it is set to max > > exclusivity possible. Can somebody fix this please? May be we should > > not > > define MCA_BTL_EXCLUSIVITY_LOW to zero? > > > > -- > > Gleb. > > ___ > > devel mailing list > > de...@open-mpi.org > > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel > > > -- > Jeff Squyres > Cisco Systems > ___ > devel mailing list > de...@open-mpi.org > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel -- Gleb.
Re: [OMPI devel] SCTP BTL exclusivity value problem
Yes -- this came up in a prior thread. See what I proposed: http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2007/12/2698.php (no one replied, so no action was taken) Are you on a system where the SCTP BTL is being built? What kind of environment is it? On Dec 12, 2007, at 9:38 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote: Hi, SCTP BTL sets its exclusivity value to MCA_BTL_EXCLUSIVITY_LOW - 1 but MCA_BTL_EXCLUSIVITY_LOW is zero so actually it is set to max exclusivity possible. Can somebody fix this please? May be we should not define MCA_BTL_EXCLUSIVITY_LOW to zero? -- Gleb. ___ devel mailing list de...@open-mpi.org http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel -- Jeff Squyres Cisco Systems
