On May 4 2010, Terry Dontje wrote:
Ralph Castain wrote:
Is a configure-time test good enough? For example, are all Linuxes
the same in this regard. That is if you built OMPI on RH and it
configured in the new SysV SM will those bits actually run on other
Linux systems correctly? I think
On May 4, 2010, at 7:56 AM, Terry Dontje wrote:
> Ralph Castain wrote:
>>
>>
>> On May 4, 2010, at 3:45 AM, Terry Dontje wrote:
>>
>>> Is a configure-time test good enough? For example, are all Linuxes the
>>> same in this regard. That is if you built OMPI on RH and it configured in
>>>
Ralph Castain wrote:
On May 4, 2010, at 3:45 AM, Terry Dontje wrote:
Is a configure-time test good enough? For example, are all Linuxes
the same in this regard. That is if you built OMPI on RH and it
configured in the new SysV SM will those bits actually run on other
Linux systems
On May 4, 2010, at 3:45 AM, Terry Dontje wrote:
> Is a configure-time test good enough? For example, are all Linuxes the same
> in this regard. That is if you built OMPI on RH and it configured in the new
> SysV SM will those bits actually run on other Linux systems correctly? I
> think
On May 4 2010, Terry Dontje wrote:
Is a configure-time test good enough? For example, are all Linuxes the
same in this regard. That is if you built OMPI on RH and it configured
in the new SysV SM will those bits actually run on other Linux systems
correctly? I think Jeff had hinted to
Is a configure-time test good enough? For example, are all Linuxes the
same in this regard. That is if you built OMPI on RH and it configured
in the new SysV SM will those bits actually run on other Linux systems
correctly? I think Jeff had hinted to this similarly when suggesting
this may
Hi All,
New configure-time test added - thanks for the suggestion, Jeff.
Update and give it a whirl.
Ethan - could you please try again? This time, I'm hoping sysv
support will be disabled ;-).
Thanks!
--
Samuel K. Gutierrez
Los Alamos National Laboratory
On May 3, 2010, at 9:18 AM,
On May 3 2010, Jeff Squyres wrote:
Write a small C program that does something like the following (this is
off the top of my head):
fork a child
child goes to sleep immediately
sysv alloc a segment
attach to it
ipc rm it
parent wakes up child
child tries to attach to segment
If that
Hi Jeff,
Sounds like a plan :-).
Thanks!
--
Samuel K. Gutierrez
Los Alamos National Laboratory
On May 3, 2010, at 9:12 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
It might well be that you need a configure test to determine whether
this behavior occurs or not. Heck, it may even need to be a run-
time test!
It might well be that you need a configure test to determine whether this
behavior occurs or not. Heck, it may even need to be a run-time test! Hrm.
Write a small C program that does something like the following (this is off the
top of my head):
fork a child
child goes to sleep immediately
10 matches
Mail list logo
