All of your insight sounds great. Personally, I'm a little bit more
interested in the 'swyping' concept - has anyone here used it? I've
only seen demonstration videos.
I have no time to do this personally, but it would be nice to be able
to use T9 input, an on-screen-keyboard, a full terminal-capa
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 01:19:52 +0100 Marcos Mezo babbled:
> On Thursday 15 January 2009 00:42:49 Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:01:20 + Andy Green babbled:
> >
> > nothing to do with hardware here - all to do with software stack. the fact
> > is there is no generic "zoom" c
On Thursday 15 January 2009 00:42:49 Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:01:20 + Andy Green babbled:
>
> nothing to do with hardware here - all to do with software stack. the fact
> is there is no generic "zoom" control for apps - and apps have no concept
> of one. you also need t
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:01:20 + Andy Green babbled:
nothing to do with hardware here - all to do with software stack. the fact is
there is no generic "zoom" control for apps - and apps have no concept of one.
you also need to think about where in the stack you sit - if you go
to /dev/input...
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 4:29 AM, Christopher Friedt
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I wanted to write to the list about two things - 1) zooming in the
> browser, photo viewer, etc, and 2) 'swiping' instead of typing
>
> 1)
>
> Assuming (well, hoping really) that could also apply to the
> touch-screen on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Somebody in the thread at some point said:
| Are there any hardware engineers who can verify whether or not the
| touch-screen on the Neo or FR could register or generate motion-based
| events? If not, is this something that could be done easily in
|
