Re: [OpenSER-Devel] SF.net SVN: openser: [3163] trunk/modules/permissions/mi.c

2007-11-19 Thread Dan Pascu
On Monday 19 November 2007, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: > Good question :)...Maybe 202 Accepted ?? That's why I asked the question, to see what other people think of this. -- Dan ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.openser.org http://lists.openser.org/c

Re: [OpenSER-Devel] SF.net SVN: openser: [3163] trunk/modules/permissions/mi.c

2007-11-19 Thread Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
Good question :)...Maybe 202 Accepted ?? regards, Bogdan Dan Pascu wrote: > On Monday 19 November 2007, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: > >> Right - please have it changed. >> > > Have it changed to what exactly? 200 OK or some other 2xx Reload not > necessary? > > >> Regards, >> Bogdan >>

Re: [OpenSER-Devel] SF.net SVN: openser: [3163] trunk/modules/permissions/mi.c

2007-11-19 Thread Dan Pascu
On Monday 19 November 2007, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: > Right - please have it changed. Have it changed to what exactly? 200 OK or some other 2xx Reload not necessary? > > Regards, > Bogdan > > Dan Pascu wrote: > > On Monday 19 November 2007, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: > >> Hi Dan, > >> > >> ma

Re: [OpenSER-Devel] SF.net SVN: openser: [3163] trunk/modules/permissions/mi.c

2007-11-19 Thread Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
Right - please have it changed. Regards, Bogdan Dan Pascu wrote: > On Monday 19 November 2007, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: > >> Hi Dan, >> >> makes sense what you are saying - actually there are a lot of places >> where the return codes of the MI commands needs to be change (there are >> mixtur

Re: [OpenSER-Devel] SF.net SVN: openser: [3163] trunk/modules/permissions/mi.c

2007-11-19 Thread Dan Pascu
On Monday 19 November 2007, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: > Hi Dan, > > makes sense what you are saying - actually there are a lot of places > where the return codes of the MI commands needs to be change (there are > mixture between the return code of the MI command and the retune code > of the comman

Re: [OpenSER-Devel] SF.net SVN: openser: [3163] trunk/modules/permissions/mi.c

2007-11-19 Thread Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
Hi Dan, makes sense what you are saying - actually there are a lot of places where the return codes of the MI commands needs to be change (there are mixture between the return code of the MI command and the retune code of the command itself - like if I a look after an non-existing AOR, the MI

Re: [OpenSER-Devel] SF.net SVN: openser: [3163] trunk/modules/permissions/mi.c

2007-11-16 Thread Dan Pascu
I wonder if we should send a 200 OK for this case. Since the database reload is not necessary because caching is disabled, having this operation be a NO-OP is tempting to allow a provisioning frontend to issue a reload command that works on both a caching-enabled proxy as well as on a caching-

[OpenSER-Devel] SF.net SVN: openser: [3163] trunk/modules/permissions/mi.c

2007-11-16 Thread Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
Revision: 3163 http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=3163&view=rev Author: bogdan_iancu Date: 2007-11-16 08:03:58 -0800 (Fri, 16 Nov 2007) Log Message: --- - fixed trusted_reload MI command - disable it if cache is not used. Reported by Dan Pascu. Modified Path