Revision: 7502
http://opensips.svn.sourceforge.net/opensips/?rev=7502view=rev
Author: anca_vamanu
Date: 2010-12-10 16:13:04 + (Fri, 10 Dec 2010)
Log Message:
---
- fixed crash in prepare statements (thanks to Duane Larson for help with
debugging)
Modified Paths:
Revision: 7503
http://opensips.svn.sourceforge.net/opensips/?rev=7503view=rev
Author: anca_vamanu
Date: 2010-12-10 16:15:29 + (Fri, 10 Dec 2010)
Log Message:
---
- fixed crash in prepare statements (thanks to Duane Larson for help with
debugging)
Modified Paths:
Anca Vamanu writes:
Log Message:
---
- fixed crash in prepare statements (thanks to Duane Larson for help with
debugging)
Modified Paths:
--
trunk/modules/presence/subscribe.c
anca,
hopefully this is the same that i have reported. once you backport to 1.6,
On 12/10/2010 06:20 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Anca Vamanu writes:
Log Message:
---
- fixed crash in prepare statements (thanks to Duane Larson for help with
debugging)
Modified Paths:
--
trunk/modules/presence/subscribe.c
anca,
hopefully this is the same
On 12/10/2010 06:30 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
yes, i have rls module loaded. if i don't see the crash anymore in a
few days, i'll close the ticket.
It's this for sure - the same function is used by rls module also with
the db connection as an argument and a copy paste lead to using the
Hello Juha,
This patch affects only presence events that require aggregation.
However, there is a mechanism to send dummy notification for every
event, when there's no info to be published for a subscriber.
The dummy notification content is built by a function that is set
during event
Bugs item #3054532, was opened at 2010-08-27 21:50
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anca_vamanu
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=1086410aid=3054532group_id=232389
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the
i tried to run new version of presence module that would include anca's
crash fix. the result was that my presence server didn't start:
Dec 10 20:19:01 sip /usr/sbin/pres-serv[20005]:
ERROR:core:db_check_table_version: invalid version 4 for table presentity
found, expected 5
i consider it a
Hello Juha,
The new feature was in the trunk for a while.
The opensips 1.6.4 release is scheduled for mid December. The feature
was backported from trunk in order to prepare the release.
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Juha Heinanen j...@tutpro.com wrote:
i tried to run
the new field in presentity table has been defined like this:
extra_hdrs BLOB NOT NULL
how can i upgrade an existing table when the field cannot be null and
there is no default value?
-- juha
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.opensips.org
That was a copy/paste mistake (duplication of body field).
I will fix it soon. The default value is an empty string ''.
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Juha Heinanen j...@tutpro.com wrote:
the new field in presentity table has been defined like this:
extra_hdrs BLOB NOT
Revision: 7504
http://opensips.svn.sourceforge.net/opensips/?rev=7504view=rev
Author: osas
Date: 2010-12-10 19:16:49 + (Fri, 10 Dec 2010)
Log Message:
---
presence: set the default value to '' for extra_hdrs field from presentity table
Modified Paths:
--
Revision: 7505
http://opensips.svn.sourceforge.net/opensips/?rev=7505view=rev
Author: osas
Date: 2010-12-10 19:21:05 + (Fri, 10 Dec 2010)
Log Message:
---
presence: set the default value to '' for extra_hdrs field from presentity table
Modified Paths:
--
Revision: 7506
http://opensips.svn.sourceforge.net/opensips/?rev=7506view=rev
Author: osas
Date: 2010-12-10 19:23:39 + (Fri, 10 Dec 2010)
Log Message:
---
b2b: adding the dbtext and db_berkley b2b_entities and b2b_logic files
Added Paths:
---
Fixed in revision 7505.
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Ovidiu Sas o...@voipembedded.com wrote:
That was a copy/paste mistake (duplication of body field).
I will fix it soon. The default value is an empty string ''.
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 1:56
Ovidiu Sas writes:
Fixed in revision 7505.
ovidiu,
thanks and sorry about my rant yesterday. i was tired after long
flights.
but i still feel that it would be cleaner to have real 1.6.x branches
in svn rather than just 1.6 branch that now includes both bug fixes and
backwards incompatible
16 matches
Mail list logo