Branch: refs/heads/1.10
Home: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips
Commit: 6302414c57720a5a6a512a1df9fa27ac43b2dc05
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/6302414c57720a5a6a512a1df9fa27ac43b2dc05
Author: Liviu Chircu li...@opensips.org
Date: 2014-04-11 (Fri, 11 Apr 2014)
Branch: refs/heads/1.8
Home: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips
Commit: 916d8cfab7edf625233fd4c7b314d1dd3b5e7957
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/916d8cfab7edf625233fd4c7b314d1dd3b5e7957
Author: Liviu Chircu li...@opensips.org
Date: 2014-04-11 (Fri, 11 Apr 2014)
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips
Commit: 5c790aa9431401dc0b906a9a8694dffb6bd1d34b
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/5c790aa9431401dc0b906a9a8694dffb6bd1d34b
Author: Liviu Chircu li...@opensips.org
Date: 2014-04-11 (Fri, 11 Apr
Branch: refs/heads/1.11
Home: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips
Commit: d427267bb98a22cdc747caf1cbfbc3796a5dea0c
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/d427267bb98a22cdc747caf1cbfbc3796a5dea0c
Author: Liviu Chircu li...@opensips.org
Date: 2014-04-11 (Fri, 11 Apr 2014)
Hello, i am testing the new feature binary interface with the usrloc module.
My tests are with 3 OpenSIPS servers.
10.64.7.20 | 10.64.7.21 | 10.64.7.22
so, when i register a new sip extensions on the first node, y could see events
come in the rest nodes but there is also the next error:
```
Hi,
The data replication feature (of dialog and usrloc) aims to offer hot backup
machines. These backup machines must listen on the same interface as the
original machine (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_IP_address). This offers
quick failover without the need for DB reload operations at
ok, understood.
My intention here is to have multiples opensips sharing all of them usrloc info
(without using db_url).
If i do:
(only comment the check of local socket)
```
--- a/modules/usrloc/ureplication.c
+++ b/modules/usrloc/ureplication.c
@@ -294,10 +294,10 @@ static int
Hi,
The bad news is that all modules which depend on usrloc and make use of
ucontact_t.sock may behave unexpectendly (maybe OK, maybe minor error reports
or, maybe some unhandled crash?)
The good news is that **nathelper** is the only module in this situation. So
unless you're using contact
Great! in that case, would be correct to have a parameter to disable the check
of local socket in usrloc module?
maybe, skip_replicated_local_socket (int) ?
Best regards.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
