[OpenSIPS-Devel] [OpenSIPS/opensips] 3a0bca: regenerate the TLS CA and default certificate

2014-04-17 Thread Liviu Chircu
Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips Commit: 3a0bca84986d81a8d64037d082b86ae13b5a50f0 https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/3a0bca84986d81a8d64037d082b86ae13b5a50f0 Author: Liviu Chircu li...@opensips.org Date: 2014-04-17 (Thu, 17 Apr

[OpenSIPS-Devel] [OpenSIPS/opensips] 61c148: regenerate the TLS CA and default certificate

2014-04-17 Thread Liviu Chircu
Branch: refs/heads/1.10 Home: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips Commit: 61c1481bdf10f5a280d2a1016aea392596e42ddb https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/61c1481bdf10f5a280d2a1016aea392596e42ddb Author: Liviu Chircu li...@opensips.org Date: 2014-04-17 (Thu, 17 Apr 2014)

[OpenSIPS-Devel] [OpenSIPS/opensips] ee2556: regenerate the TLS CA and default certificate

2014-04-17 Thread Liviu Chircu
Branch: refs/heads/1.8 Home: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips Commit: ee2556abbce063542283b59af780721a2f01c825 https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/ee2556abbce063542283b59af780721a2f01c825 Author: Liviu Chircu li...@opensips.org Date: 2014-04-17 (Thu, 17 Apr 2014)

[OpenSIPS-Devel] [OpenSIPS/opensips] 2b2092: regenerate the TLS CA and default certificate

2014-04-17 Thread Liviu Chircu
Branch: refs/heads/1.11 Home: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips Commit: 2b2092b49a2636ac1298ea0fba086f534a31e846 https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/2b2092b49a2636ac1298ea0fba086f534a31e846 Author: Liviu Chircu li...@opensips.org Date: 2014-04-17 (Thu, 17 Apr 2014)

Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] [opensips] Wrong CA private key password in TLS README (#172)

2014-04-17 Thread Liviu Chircu
Closed #172. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/issues/172___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] [opensips] Wrong CA private key password in TLS README (#172)

2014-04-17 Thread Liviu Chircu
Hello, Fixed on master, 1.11, 1.10 and 1.8. Best regards, --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/issues/172#issuecomment-40703023___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.opensips.org

[OpenSIPS-Devel] [opensips] RabbitMQ for Acc breaks in 1.11 (#207)

2014-04-17 Thread Jonathan Hulme
Recently upgrading from 1.10 to 1.11, CDR data is no longer been generated through an event, which then is passed to the RabbitMQ handler. However in the startup route, I am able to successfully able to raise a E_ACC_CDR event from the startup route. --- Reply to this email directly or view it

Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] [opensips] RabbitMQ for Acc breaks in 1.11 (#207)

2014-04-17 Thread Jonathan Hulme
I did not notice any errors in the script. I was using latest version, both cloned and compiled today. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/issues/207#issuecomment-40713124___ Devel mailing list

Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] [opensips] Possible bug in binary interface with usrloc module (#198)

2014-04-17 Thread Liviu Chircu
Hello, Even though your scenario seems to work within your testing network, things will not be the same in the real world, because the listening socket really needs to match the initial one (of OpenSIPS instance 1) if you want to reach a client who is behind NAT from the secondary instance

Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] [opensips] RabbitMQ for Acc breaks in 1.11 (#207)

2014-04-17 Thread Răzvan Crainea
Hi, Jonathan! Besides the heartbeat extension, nothing else has changed in the event_rabbitmq module. Are you using this feature? Regards, Razvan Crainea OpenSIPS Core Developer http://www.opensips-solutions.com On 04/17/2014 04:24 PM, Jonathan Hulme wrote: I did not notice any errors in the

Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] [opensips] RabbitMQ for Acc breaks in 1.11 (#207)

2014-04-17 Thread Jonathan Hulme
I did try changing this to see if it affected behaviour. But it is disabled after it made no difference. If that is all that has changed in the rabbitmq then its more than likely the bug is before the event is raised. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: