[OpenSIPS-Devel] [OpenSIPS/opensips] 7637f5: Proper reporting for invalid module parameter type...

2014-02-20 Thread Liviu Chircu 
  Branch: refs/heads/master
  Home:   https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips
  Commit: 7637f589f8ff9b2ce636a63d6eab5ffc05efae67
  
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/7637f589f8ff9b2ce636a63d6eab5ffc05efae67
  Author: Liviu Chircu li...@opensips.org
  Date:   2014-02-20 (Thu, 20 Feb 2014)

  Changed paths:
M modparam.c

  Log Message:
  ---
  Proper reporting for invalid module parameter types


___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] [opensips] call_control: Passthrough sip_application (#170)

2014-02-20 Thread Saúl Ibarra Corretgé 
 @@ -228,6 +232,7 @@ struct module_exports exports = {
  str call_token;
  char* prepaid_account;
  int call_limit;
 +str sip_application;

Please move this after call_token.

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/pull/170/files#r9901510___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel

[OpenSIPS-Devel] Initial support for RTPproxy-ng protocol in Wireshark

2014-02-20 Thread Peter Lemenkov 
Hello All!
After finishing with RTPproxy protocol support, I'm working on a
RTPproxy-ng protocol support in Wireshark. I've just submitted an
initial version with a very basic functionality:

https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/268/

So far there is no support for RTP/RTCP dissection based on a
RTPproxy-ng replies, no transaction matching, no expert functionality,
and the rest of functionality already existed in the RTPproxy
dissector is also missing, but I plan to add it back shortly.

I'm on a very early stage with RTPproxy-ng protocol support so I can't
really advise anyone to try it so just fyi.

Sorry for the crossposting.
-- 
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.

___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] [opensips] [RFC] An initial attempt of porting rtpproxy-ng module from your twin project to OpenSIPS. (#152)

2014-02-20 Thread Bogdan Andrei IANCU 
Hi @lemenkov  - this rtpproxy_ng module..what is the difference from the 
existing rtpproxy module ?

Thanks and regards,
Bogdan

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/pull/152#issuecomment-35653788___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] [opensips] 1.10 - lumps bug when doing fix_nated_sdp() with topology_hiding() (#116)

2014-02-20 Thread Bogdan Andrei IANCU 
@nikbyte, the problem is you do in the same time fix_nated_sdp() and 
rtpproxy_offer() - both functions are trying to re-write some IP address in 
SDP. I agree this should not lead to bogus message, but also from logical 
perspective is a bit of a non-sense :).

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/issues/116#issuecomment-35654767___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] [opensips] OpenSIPS 1.10 crash after upgrade (#114)

2014-02-20 Thread Bogdan Andrei IANCU 
It seems @rrb3942 and @digipigeon are happy (no complains after the fix), so 
closing this ticket.

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/issues/114#issuecomment-35654898___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] [opensips] OpenSIPS 1.10 crash after upgrade (#114)

2014-02-20 Thread Bogdan Andrei IANCU 
Closed #114.

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/issues/114___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] [opensips] 1.10 - lumps bug when doing fix_nated_sdp() with topology_hiding() (#116)

2014-02-20 Thread Nick Altmann 
Hmm... Maybe you're right. I'll check. But in my case it has logical 
perspective.

You know, maybe it would be very nice to have in-script function to apply all 
lumps (and rebuild message), like in kamailio.

What do you think?


---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/issues/116#issuecomment-35690120___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel