Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips
Commit: 9d82861708457b337d74c43a145a05b5a668d6fb
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/9d82861708457b337d74c43a145a05b5a668d6fb
Author: Liviu Chircu
Date: 2019-04-19 (Fri, 19 Apr 2019)
Changed
Branch: refs/heads/3.0
Home: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips
Commit: 6374b066c37375707b037dc01fa8558023e22838
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/6374b066c37375707b037dc01fa8558023e22838
Author: Liviu Chircu
Date: 2019-04-19 (Fri, 19 Apr 2019)
Changed paths:
Branch: refs/heads/2.4
Home: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips
Commit: 887f9f0e032da4bf092540cb92369a6daee90ffa
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/887f9f0e032da4bf092540cb92369a6daee90ffa
Author: Liviu Chircu
Date: 2019-04-19 (Fri, 19 Apr 2019)
Changed paths:
Branch: refs/heads/3.0
Home: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips
Commit: ce8b709ea66deaa652852730e8221bd2b6ffbf0f
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/ce8b709ea66deaa652852730e8221bd2b6ffbf0f
Author: Vlad Patrascu
Date: 2019-04-19 (Fri, 19 Apr 2019)
Changed paths:
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips
Commit: 32d3163d9bb3a98497c1671bbb7ffc0f034b69fb
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/32d3163d9bb3a98497c1671bbb7ffc0f034b69fb
Author: Vlad Patrascu
Date: 2019-04-19 (Fri, 19 Apr 2019)
Changed
Branch: refs/heads/script_reload
Home: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
Resending the issue described below to the devel mailing list as I believe this
is a bug, not a configuration issue.
Ben Newlin
From: Users on behalf of Ben Newlin
Reply-To: OpenSIPS users mailling list
Date: Monday, April 15, 2019 at 7:20 PM
To: OpenSIPS users mailling list
Subject: Re:
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips
Commit: 3b83d36c9fd47c13d862dbd866b921dc14b669c3
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/3b83d36c9fd47c13d862dbd866b921dc14b669c3
Author: Razvan Crainea
Date: 2019-04-19 (Fri, 19 Apr 2019)
Changed
Branch: refs/heads/3.0
Home: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips
Commit: b277ddf0b4b1d206beb8a06ddacf1d26a4eb9483
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/b277ddf0b4b1d206beb8a06ddacf1d26a4eb9483
Author: Razvan Crainea
Date: 2019-04-19 (Fri, 19 Apr 2019)
Changed paths:
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips
Commit: 3b196a9da41b85c3872b21336c2aea8d3dc3a2ec
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/3b196a9da41b85c3872b21336c2aea8d3dc3a2ec
Author: Razvan Crainea
Date: 2019-04-19 (Fri, 19 Apr 2019)
Changed
Probably meant "reversed", referring to how ENUM works (e.g. 40741333444
-> 4.4.4.3.3.3.1.4.7.0.4.e164.arpa.). ITAD numbers[1] apparently skip
the reversal part.
[1]:
https://www.iana.org/assignments/trip-parameters/trip-parameters.xml#trip-parameters-5
Liviu Chircu
OpenSIPS Developer
I found this statement in the enum module documentation containing a typo:
The ITAD is left intact and not refersed as ENUM requires.
but I have no idea what refersed stands for (reversed, replaced, referred)? so
I could not fix it.
--
Dan
___
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips
Commit: 67374892acbccc79758f22499e9ce32c68d7b258
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/67374892acbccc79758f22499e9ce32c68d7b258
Author: Dan Pascu
Date: 2019-04-19 (Fri, 19 Apr 2019)
Changed paths:
Branch: refs/heads/3.0
Home: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips
Commit: bacc495638c2555be0f1aae5e9ed99ad19b23fab
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/bacc495638c2555be0f1aae5e9ed99ad19b23fab
Author: Dan Pascu
Date: 2019-04-19 (Fri, 19 Apr 2019)
Changed paths:
Indeed, this is caused by the preprocessor extension, which adds some
extra tokens which are not consumed because they happen to be enclosed
within " ", so the STRING lexer rule takes precedence and includes
them. In short, the acc module actually receives this input:
modparam("acc",
On 19 Apr 2019, at 8:38, Liviu Chircu wrote:
> Can you try to skip the backslashes? Syntactically, it should work without
> them.
Removing them changes nothing. What fixes it is if I put everything on a single
line (remove both backslashes and newlines between items). It used to work with
Hi Donat,
append_branch() simply copies the current RURI (and its related
attributes) as a new branch. So an append_branch() without any RURI
modification will create a new branch identical (as destination and SIP
properties) to the RURI - still there are 2 different branches, so
different
17 matches
Mail list logo