Guys have you considered using a shared Dropbox folder instead?
2013/4/1 Sławomir Nizio
> On Mon, 1 Apr 2013 18:36:04 +0200
> Danilo Pianini wrote:
>
> > Agree. We could adopt as a rule to leave a comment when changing
> something,
> > and just use a FTP server.
>
> I disagree: CVS provides hi
On Mon, 1 Apr 2013 18:36:04 +0200
Danilo Pianini wrote:
> Agree. We could adopt as a rule to leave a comment when changing something,
> and just use a FTP server.
I disagree: CVS provides history for free anyway* so it's not a big deal;
and it is easier to collaborate this way than using an FTP
Agree. We could adopt as a rule to leave a comment when changing something,
and just use a FTP server.
2013/4/1 Fabio Erculiani
> The idea looks good to me.
> I also wonder, do we really need history at all? We are supposed to
> know what and why we did modifications in the past.
>
> My 0.02$..
The history could be kept anyway on the web. I will post soon another reply
on CVS.
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Fabio Erculiani wrote:
> The idea looks good to me.
> I also wonder, do we really need history at all? We are supposed to
> know what and why we did modifications in the past.
>
>
The idea looks good to me.
I also wonder, do we really need history at all? We are supposed to
know what and why we did modifications in the past.
My 0.02$...
--
Fabio Erculiani
Hello all,
As you may know, Sabayon uses git for its repositories.
It is a good version control system: it is fast, has
really good support for branching, support for rewriting
history (which has good use cases) and is pretty well
known among VCSs).
However, there is nothing without disadvantages
