On 21 Jan 2014, at 21:39, Mohammed Hassan
wrote:
> Each store has an audience. Harbour has its own audience as well as openrepos.
This is exactly what I'm thinking, Openrepos is very appealing to me for
example,
but wouldn't I recommend it for my mother who doesn't have the required
skill /
Please note: I actually didn't follow this discussion very closely but I
think I can add at least one small comment.
On 01/21/2014 10:03 PM, Martin Kolman wrote:
> 21.1.2014 21:34, Martin Grimme:
>> ...
> Just a slight correction. As far as I know, you can only upload source code
> to Extras-Devel
21.1.2014 21:34, Martin Grimme:
You can compare
those in their function to Maemo Extras and Maemo Extras Devel in the old N900
days.
Everybody could upload to Extras Devel, but to get stuff into Extras, it had
to pass a quarantine and a (IMHO slow and frustrating) QA phase.
Only Extras was pre-
Hi
2014/1/21, kaa :
> [...] Crap [...] Bla, bla , bla .. FUD .. bla bla bla [...] LOL [...]
> bullshit [...] Howgh [...]
Thank you for valuable feedback. :)
IMHO, it makes sense to have both, Harbour and OpenRepos. You can compare
those in their function to Maemo Extras and Maemo Extras Devel i
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 02:15:14PM +0200, Joona Hoikkala wrote:
> Openrepos doesn't have any QA process, and you can publish your own closed
> source blobs through it.
> Meaning that someone could potentially push an application that steals or
> destroys users data.
Maybe openrepos does not hav
To: Sailfish OS Developers
Subject: Re: [SailfishDevel] Scriptlets in RPM hot allowed to Harbour
.. runned as root .. because doing work on root level.
Simple apps like "life years/months/days" are nice, but we need many
better, stronger, "under-skin" apps..
Like Profile
...@iol.cz]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2014 2:22 PM
To: Sailfish OS Developers
Subject: Re: [SailfishDevel] Scriptlets in RPM hot allowed to Harbour
.. runned as root .. because doing work on root level.
Simple apps like "life years/months/days" are nice, but we need many
better, stronge
a long run we hopefully have some better API or rules to solve this. I'm
>> only saying current situation.
>>
>> re, Jonni
>>
>> From: devel-boun...@lists.sailfishos.org
>> [devel-boun...@lists.sailfishos.org] on behalf of kaa [k...@iol.cz]
>
devel-boun...@lists.sailfishos.org]
on behalf of kaa [k...@iol.cz]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2014 2:22 PM
To: Sailfish OS Developers
Subject: Re: [SailfishDevel] Scriptlets in RPM hot allowed to Harbour
.. runned as root .. because doing work on root level.
Simple apps like "life years/months
>
>
> [nemo@localhost ~]$ ssu ar chum
> http://repo.merproject.org/obs/sailfishos:/chum:/1.0.2.5/1.0.2.5_armv7hl/
>
> Interesting.
On my emulator and sailfish-n9 it cannot make dbus call as nemo user(as
root it can), fallsback to libssu, which cannot do anything, 'you're not
root. run 'ssu ur' as r
-boun...@lists.sailfishos.org]
on behalf of kaa [k...@iol.cz]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2014 2:22 PM
To: Sailfish OS Developers
Subject: Re: [SailfishDevel] Scriptlets in RPM hot allowed to Harbour
.. runned as root .. because doing work on root level.
Simple apps like "life years/months/days" are ni
rday, January 11, 2014 11:22 AM
To: Sailfish OS Developers
Subject: [SailfishDevel] Scriptlets in RPM hot allowed to Harbour
Why RPM scriptlets not allowed to harbour?
___
SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list
___
W dniu 12.01.2014 14:14, Mikael Hermansson pisze:
To clarify... What I meant is app itself need no root. ofcourse user
still need to pass root password to libssh to execute commands...
well it sounds like a solution, but I would say it's a bit partisan type
of thing. Anyway I would like to hea
To clarify... What I meant is app *itself* need no root. ofcourse user still
need to
pass root password to libssh to execute commands...
On Sunday 12 January 2014 14.11.55 Mikael Hermansson wrote:
> On Sunday 12 January 2014 11.21.56 Filip Kłębczyk wrote:
> > So what would be the proper way of
On Sunday 12 January 2014 11.21.56 Filip Kłębczyk wrote:
>
> So what would be the proper way of creating such app? Can someone from
> Jolla - Thomas or anyone there who feels competent in this area suggest
> the proper way of handling such use case. That could really help to
> mitigate some of the
All run as user:
(Aside: the "chum" repository is something I'm doing with my community hat on,
not my Jolla one. It's intended to be run ***and QA'ed*** by the community. More
on this 'soon')
On 11/01/14 21:45, Semuonov Basil wrote:> I guess, that I am the person who
started this story about scr
W dniu 11.01.2014 16:06, Thomas Perl pisze:
The problem in this thread is that somebody is trying to do something that’s a
bad idea in general.
The question should not be “How do I make /usr/share/$NAME world-writable?”
(that is usually NEVER a good idea), but rather “My app wants to do this a
W dniu 11.01.2014 16:06, Thomas Perl pisze:
The problem in this thread is that somebody is trying to do something that’s a
bad idea in general.
The question should not be “How do I make /usr/share/$NAME world-writable?”
(that is usually NEVER a good idea), but rather “My app wants to do this a
comes to device.
From: devel-boun...@lists.sailfishos.org [devel-boun...@lists.sailfishos.org]
on behalf of Semuonov Basil [basil.semuo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2014 11:45 PM
To: devel@lists.sailfishos.org
Subject: [SailfishDevel] Scriptlets in RPM
I guess, that I am the person who started this story about scriptlets.
As Thomas suggested at his mail (
https://lists.sailfishos.org/pipermail/devel/2014-January/002767.html ),
here is the problem which I personally trying to solve using postinst
scriplet:
Sailfish use zypp as backend, packagekit
Hi,
Sorry, I forgot about PackageKit! ;) I was still in the apt world :)
Regards,
--
Marcin
2014/1/11 Mike Sheldon
> Hi Marcin,
>
> On Sat, 2014-01-11 at 16:49 +0100, Marcin M. wrote:
> > So how else can we update sudoers...? No custom package manager could
> > be done without it.
>
> As I
Hi Marcin,
On Sat, 2014-01-11 at 16:49 +0100, Marcin M. wrote:
> So how else can we update sudoers...? No custom package manager could
> be done without it.
As I understand it you don't need to be root to carry out package
management tasks on Sailfish due to the way it implements packagekit,
whi
El Saturday 11 January 2014, Alejandro Exojo escribió:
> El Saturday 11 January 2014, Andrey Kozhevnikov escribió:
> > There are reasons for chmod 666 in /usr/share/appname
>
> There are reasons for being 666 permissions, I got that, but isn't it
> possible
After reading Thomas' message, I've re
So how else can we update sudoers...? No custom package manager could be
done without it.
--
Marcin
2014/1/11 Thomas Perl
> Duty calls[1]...
>
> tl;dr: No postinst scripts in Harbour. chmod 666 stuff in /usr/ is wrong.
>
> On 11 Jan 2014, at 13:51, Martin Kolman wrote:
> > 11.1.2014 13:34, Al
Duty calls[1]...
tl;dr: No postinst scripts in Harbour. chmod 666 stuff in /usr/ is wrong.
On 11 Jan 2014, at 13:51, Martin Kolman wrote:
> 11.1.2014 13:34, Alejandro Exojo:
>>> QA can check if post script doing some good job and allow it?
>> If the script is simple, yes. If it is not, there is
El Saturday 11 January 2014, Andrey Kozhevnikov escribió:
> There are reasons for chmod 666 in /usr/share/appname
There are reasons for being 666 permissions, I got that, but isn't it possible
the make that directory with such permissions as default?
Sorry, I'm trying to understand the problem.
El Saturday 11 January 2014, Martin Kolman escribió:
> 11.1.2014 13:34, Alejandro Exojo:
> >> QA can check if post script doing some good job and allow it?
> >
> > If the script is simple, yes. If it is not, there is a serious risk that
> > somebody adds a trojan horse to the phone.
> >
> > That
11.1.2014 13:34, Alejandro Exojo:
QA can check if post script doing some good job and allow it?
If the script is simple, yes. If it is not, there is a serious risk that
somebody adds a trojan horse to the phone.
That would mean that somebody has to define what is a simple script. And that a
pro
There are reasons for chmod 666 in /usr/share/appname
Also i'm using scriptlets for closing my applications before
installation new version/remove and so on
On 11.01.2014 18:34, Alejandro Exojo wrote:
El Saturday 11 January 2014, Andrey Kozhevnikov escribió:
you suggested to change /usr/shar
El Saturday 11 January 2014, Andrey Kozhevnikov escribió:
> you suggested to change /usr/share/appname/data folder permissions in
> post script, so that means no way to go to harbour for this application?
Why is such thing needed? And even if needed, why not making the permissions
right from the
] Scriptlets in RPM hot allowed to Harbour
Why RPM scriptlets not allowed to harbour?
___
SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list
___
SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list
.
From: devel-boun...@lists.sailfishos.org [devel-boun...@lists.sailfishos.org]
on behalf of Andrey Kozhevnikov [coderusin...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2014 11:22 AM
To: Sailfish OS Developers
Subject: [SailfishDevel] Scriptlets in RPM hot allowed to Harbour
: [SailfishDevel] Scriptlets in RPM hot allowed to Harbour
Why RPM scriptlets not allowed to harbour?
___
SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list
___
SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list
Why RPM scriptlets not allowed to harbour?
___
SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list
34 matches
Mail list logo
