Anybody dried -i jaildir?

If we are serious about security, it seems like a good tool to add to the collection. Is there a HOWTO set it up? I didn't find one for NTP. Are all jaildirs sufficiently similar that a global HOWTO is all one needs to set one up for NTP? I found one for FreeBSD, but not much for Linux.

Re: What are people putting in /etc/ntp.d/*.conf?

e...@thyrsus.com said: > Gary and Mark asked me for something like such an Apache-like feature > because it makes life easier for configuration-assistant software and distro > packages. Is that true in our case? It seems like it might be, but our config file is generally simple enough that a

Re: 1.0.1 and ntpsnmpd

> You need to be running an SNMP daemon and an NTP daemon. I've got plenty of ntp servers to experiment with. >> Is there a HOWTO that tells me how to set things up? > I'll get to work on that. There may be two targets for that document. One is SNMP wizards who don't know much about ntpd.

Re: What are people putting in /etc/ntp.d/*.conf?

Hal Murray : > Is anybody actually using it? If not, why? Is it really useful? Do we think > it will make life easier for packagers/distros? Gary and Mark asked me for something like such an Apache-like feature because it makes life easier for configuration-assistant

Re: 1.0.1 and ntpsnmpd

On 02/25/2018 04:39 PM, Hal Murray via devel wrote: devel@ntpsec.org said: The only real blocker that I can see at this time is the need for broad testing. [reiteration of me requesting testers / reviewers goes here.] Is there a HOWTO that tells me how to set things up? I'll get to work on

Re: 1.0.1 and ntpsnmpd

On 02/25/2018 04:43 PM, Eric S. Raymond via devel wrote: Gary E. Miller via devel : On Sun, 25 Feb 2018 16:02:00 -0600 Ian Bruene via devel wrote: [...] OTOH, people will not test it until it is easy to test. So I'd suggest putting it in 1.0.1, and

Re: What are people putting in /etc/ntp.d/*.conf?

>> Do we have any documentation describing a use case? > Not exactly, but look at the snippets under etc/ntp.d/. All those examples don't use the auto-grab feature. Most of the file names don't end with .conf, and the one that does is a sample ntp.conf that could be better placed up a level.

Re: What are people putting in /etc/ntp.d/*.conf?

Hal Murray via devel : > Do we have any documentation describing a use case? Not exactly, but look at the snippets under etc/ntp.d/. -- http://www.catb.org/~esr/;>Eric S. Raymond My work is funded by the Internet Civil Engineering Institute: https://icei.org

Re: 1.0.1 and ntpsnmpd

Gary E. Miller via devel : > On Sun, 25 Feb 2018 16:02:00 -0600 > Ian Bruene via devel wrote: > > > The only real blocker that I can see at this time is the need for > > broad testing. [reiteration of me requesting testers / reviewers goes > > here.] > >

What are people putting in /etc/ntp.d/*.conf?

Do we have any documentation describing a use case? -- These are my opinions. I hate spam. ___ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: 1.0.1 and ntpsnmpd

devel@ntpsec.org said: > The only real blocker that I can see at this time is the need for broad > testing. [reiteration of me requesting testers / reviewers goes here.] Is there a HOWTO that tells me how to set things up? Actually, I need something before that. Why is it interesting? What

Re: 1.0.1 and ntpsnmpd

Yo Ian! On Sun, 25 Feb 2018 16:02:00 -0600 Ian Bruene via devel wrote: > The only real blocker that I can see at this time is the need for > broad testing. [reiteration of me requesting testers / reviewers goes > here.] OTOH, people will not test it until it is easy to test.

1.0.1 and ntpsnmpd

Is ntpsnmpd having it's Official Release with 1.0.1, or are we punting to the next release? Right now I do not believe that it would be crazy, but there are still options that need work, and logging is not systematic and consistent yet. The missing options I've thought of are all simple to