On 2/22/20 6:15 PM, Hal Murray via devel wrote:
> Context is the seccomp tangle. Issue #633
>
> Should I just add a helper that looks in /etc/os-release?
Are you really, absolutely, positively sure that you can't check for the
feature itself directly. If you start going down the distro-checking
On 2/22/20 8:57 PM, James Browning via devel wrote:
>> Looks like the second test is backwards. It's printing the message on a
>> system where pipefail works.
>>
>> if (set -o pipefail) 2>/dev/null
>> then
>> echo "### Old sh - no pipefail"
>> echo "### We can't test for errors during build"
>
On Sat, Feb 22, 2020, at 6:40 PM Hal Murray wrote:
>
> Looks like the second test is backwards. It's printing the message on a
> system where pipefail works.
>
> if (set -o pipefail) 2>/dev/null
> then
> echo "### Old sh - no pipefail"
> echo "### We can't test for errors during build"
> ec
> lsb_release -a might be useful here.
Thanks. Interesting, but the system I'm interested in doesn't have it in the
default package collection. I don't think I'll go down that rathole unless
waf already knows how to use it and that just pushes the problem over to
buildprep.
--
These are m
Hal Murray via devel :
>
> Context is the seccomp tangle. Issue #633
>
> Should I just add a helper that looks in /etc/os-release?
lsb_release -a might be useful here.
--
http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond
___
devel mailin
Context is the seccomp tangle. Issue #633
Should I just add a helper that looks in /etc/os-release?
--
These are my opinions. I hate spam.
___
devel mailing list
devel@ntpsec.org
http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
