On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 08:03:26PM +0800, Sanjeev Gupta wrote:
>Hal,
>I have sent in a MR,
>https://gitlab.com/NTPsec/ntpsec/-/merge_requests/1121
>for your review.
Hi Sanjeev!
I submitted https://gitlab.com/NTPsec/ntpsec/-/merge_requests/1122 before I saw
this.
My MR also updat
Hal,
I have sent in a MR,
https://gitlab.com/NTPsec/ntpsec/-/merge_requests/1121
for your review.
--
Sanjeev Gupta
+65 98551208 http://www.linkedin.com/in/ghane
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 3:21 PM Hal Murray via devel
wrote:
>
> devel@ntpsec.org said:
> > Much our of NTS code uses BSD-4-Claus
Matthew Selsky via devel :
> Hi Hal and team,
>
> Much our of NTS code uses BSD-4-Clause-UC instead of BSD-2-Clause (our
> preferred license for new code).
>
> What this license selection intentional?
No. It's a historical accident.
> Is BSD-4-Clause-UC intended for code owned by the Universit
devel@ntpsec.org said:
> Much our of NTS code uses BSD-4-Clause-UC instead of BSD-2-Clause (our
> preferred license for new code).
> What this license selection intentional?
No. I just copied something from somewhere.
> Is BSD-4-Clause-UC intended for code owned by the University of Californ
Hi Hal and team,
Much our of NTS code uses BSD-4-Clause-UC instead of BSD-2-Clause (our
preferred license for new code).
What this license selection intentional?
Is BSD-4-Clause-UC intended for code owned by the University of California, or
does it make sense for others to use this license as
