Re: Testing: IPv6

I am a fan of IPv6. Thank you for testing it. I'm interested in the results of the IPv6-only installations. On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 2:00 PM Gary E. Miller wrote: > Yo Hal! > > On Tue, 07 Jun 2016 13:05:14 -0700 > Hal Murray wrote: > > > I'm just

Re: Testing: IPv6

Yo Hal! On Tue, 07 Jun 2016 13:05:14 -0700 Hal Murray wrote: > I'm just fishing for ways to get more eyeballs looking for quirks > and/or potentially useful places to look. The IPv6 only case seems > like a good one to test. Yup. I added some IPv6 peers to my

Re: Testing: IPv6

fr...@nicholasfamilycentral.com said: > I do have IPv6 available - I run dual stack. I could setup a Pi with only > IPv6... Thanks. I'm not expecting any troubles. The testing I've done works fine. I'm just fishing for ways to get more eyeballs looking for quirks and/or potentially useful

Re: Testing: IPv6

Yo Hal! On Tue, 07 Jun 2016 11:39:07 -0700 Hal Murray <hmur...@megapathdsl.net> wrote: > There is a typical discussion/flame-war in NANOG about Netflix > blocking HE's IPv6 tunnels. That reminds me that we should be sure > we are testing IPv6. I do. I've had an HE IPv6 free

Re: Testing: IPv6

> On Jun 7, 2016, at 2:39 PM, Hal Murray <hmur...@megapathdsl.net> wrote: > > There is a typical discussion/flame-war in NANOG about Netflix blocking HE's > IPv6 tunnels. That reminds me that we should be sure we are testing IPv6. > > Is anybody running a system wit

Testing: IPv6

There is a typical discussion/flame-war in NANOG about Netflix blocking HE's IPv6 tunnels. That reminds me that we should be sure we are testing IPv6. Is anybody running a system without IPv4? What sort of strange cases should we be testing? --- Even if you don't have an IPv6 connection