Re: Anybody know anything about flatpak?

2019-07-11 Thread Eric S. Raymond via devel
Hal Murray via devel : > > Description : flatpak is a system for building, distributing and running > : sandboxed desktop applications on Linux. See > : https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/SandboxedApps for more > : information. > > I'm guessing it's targeted

Re: Anybody know anything about flatpak?

2019-07-11 Thread James Browning via devel
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019, 1:19 PM Hal Murray via devel wrote: > > Description : flatpak is a system for building, distributing and running > : sandboxed desktop applications on Linux. See > : https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/SandboxedApps for more > :

Anybody know anything about flatpak?

2019-07-11 Thread Hal Murray via devel
Description : flatpak is a system for building, distributing and running : sandboxed desktop applications on Linux. See : https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/SandboxedApps for more : information. I'm guessing it's targeted at things more complicated than

Re: Compiler warnings

2019-07-11 Thread Eric S. Raymond via devel
Hal Murray via devel : > > Is there a reason that warnings don't default to on? Yikes, I thought it did. I remember very clearly cleaning up a bazillion warnings back in the project's early days. > When configured with --enable-warnings, I get this on an old gcc. > gcc (GCC) 4.4.7 20120313

Compiler warnings

2019-07-11 Thread Hal Murray via devel
Is there a reason that warnings don't default to on? When configured with --enable-warnings, I get this on an old gcc. gcc (GCC) 4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-23) ../../ntpd/ntp_wrapdate.c: In function 'eval_gps_time': ../../ntpd/ntp_wrapdate.c:226: warning: declaration of 'refclock_name'™