Re: git head broken on NetBSD 7.2 - weird

2019-08-25 Thread Hal Murray via devel
I've tracked down the problem, but don't know how to fix it. NetBSD 7.2 has an optional newer version of OpenSSL. pkgin has installed it. I didn't do that explicitly so I assume it was dragged in by something I did install. Looks like python37-3.7.3nb1 waf is using the new headers.

Re: %m, #614

2019-08-25 Thread James Browning via devel
On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 3:49 PM Hal Murray via devel wrote: > I think it should be fixed for the release, but I don't know how to do it. > > There used to be code in the msyslog processing that handled %m if it > wasn't > included in the local printf. I'm guessing it was removed to eliminate >

%m, #614

2019-08-25 Thread Hal Murray via devel
I think it should be fixed for the release, but I don't know how to do it. There used to be code in the msyslog processing that handled %m if it wasn't included in the local printf. I'm guessing it was removed to eliminate warnings on some systems that don't support %m. All the %m cases were

Re: prep for point release of NTPSec, suggest 2019-07-31

2019-08-25 Thread Sanjeev Gupta via devel
On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 1:49 PM Achim Gratz via devel wrote: > Mark Atwood via devel writes: > > How does everyone feel about next Saturday, Aug 31 2019-07-31? > > You've got a time machine? 8-) > No, but as Chronos is not implemented, he can set time to what ever he wants on the NIST and

Re: Interesting talk on Chronos

2019-08-25 Thread Hal Murray via devel
> Any updates or thoughts? [I watched the talk but not all the Q] I think our efforts would be much more productive helping to deploy NTS. They are trying to protect against MitM attacks, but they assume that only some of the servers can be attacked. That misses the important case where the