Another item for your list.
Cleanup the table indexes in ntp_control
It has things like:
#define CS_USED_RBUF76
{ CS_USED_RBUF, RO, "used_rbuf" }, /* 76 */
That makes it a royal pain to insert or delete a slot.
We should be able to make a macro that does the
On 9/17/2018 18:20 PM, James Browning via devel wrote:
III. Document updates from me and Paul.
IV. Teach Paul how to do a git push --force and variants just kidding
Heh! Believe me, I'm trying in earnest to get my head appropriately
wrapped around the intricacies of forking ntpsec,
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018, 10:34 AM Eric S. Raymond via devel
wrote:
> Apologies for the daelay on this. Blame it on the Venusian Death Flu.
>
> We have several tasks in front of us on NTPsec. I want to get some
> consensus from the tech team, and a strategy call from Mark, on how to
>
Thanks.
Looks good. I'll send some more comments in separate messages.
I'm getting closer to actually working on SINGLEBUFFER.
Possible additions:
Refclock cleanup. The idea is to split the individual refclocks out from the
main ntpd package. I don't have good ideas on how to do it.
On 09/17/2018 01:27 PM, Ian Bruene via devel wrote:
> The build system needs to accept Go code and do Right Things with it. Go has
> Very Specific Ideas about what goes where
I have near-zero knowledge on Go, so I'm not arguing for or against
anything here, nor am I qualified to comment
On 09/17/2018 12:34 PM, Eric S. Raymond via devel wrote:
2. PYTOGO
We now have a goal of moving all our client-side code from Python to Go.
Benefits: (1) banish the horror that is Python library directories, (2)
remove a run-time dependency for operators, (3) build competence and
Apologies for the daelay on this. Blame it on the Venusian Death Flu.
We have several tasks in front of us on NTPsec. I want to get some
consensus from the tech team, and a strategy call from Mark, on how to
priority-order these things.
1. NTS
We have a funding offer from Cisco.
Blocker: To
