[Devel] [NETFILTER] early_drop() imrovement (v3)

2007-05-09 Thread Vasily Averin
When the number of conntracks is reached nf_conntrack_max limit, early_drop() tries to free one of already used conntracks. If it does not find any conntracks that may be freed, it leads to transmission errors. In current implementation the conntracks are searched in one hash bucket only. It have

[Devel] - merge-sys_clone-sys_unshare-nsproxy-and-namespace.patch removed from -mm tree

2007-05-09 Thread akpm
The patch titled Merge sys_clone()/sys_unshare() nsproxy and namespace handling has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was merge-sys_clone-sys_unshare-nsproxy-and-namespace.patch This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree

[Devel] Re: [PATCH] cpci_hotplug: Convert to use the kthread API

2007-05-09 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 7 May 2007 14:18:29 -0400 (EDT) Scott Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 4 May 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 06:07:49PM -0400, Scott Murray wrote: Sorry, it took me a few days to get to testing this out. It looks good, but I had to make a

[Devel] Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 1/9] Containers (V9): Basic container framework

2007-05-09 Thread Balbir Singh
Paul Jackson wrote: Balbir wrote: 1) Testing batch schedulers against cpusets: I doubt that the batch scheduler developers would be able to extract a cpuset test from their tests, or be able to share it if they did. Their tests tend to be large tests of batch schedulers,

[Devel] Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 1/9] Containers (V9): Basic container framework

2007-05-09 Thread Paul Jackson
Balbir wrote: Thanks for the script. Would you like to contribute this script to LTP for wider availability and testing? Sounds good - though I'm a tad lazy, and don't know how to contribute this to the LTP. You're welcome to contribute it yourself, if that's easier for you, or to point me in

[Devel] Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 1/9] Containers (V9): Basic container framework

2007-05-09 Thread Balbir Singh
Paul Jackson wrote: Balbir wrote: Thanks for the script. Would you like to contribute this script to LTP for wider availability and testing? Sounds good - though I'm a tad lazy, and don't know how to contribute this to the LTP. You're welcome to contribute it yourself, if that's easier