On Mon, 2008-04-14 at 18:01 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
On Mon, 2008-04-14 at 18:01 +0530, Veerendra Chandrappa wrote:
Hi Sukadev,
That sounds nice, I will integrate them with the LTP.
Of course it depends on the order of priority, and as I am learning the
tricks of container/ltp
Hi Shawn,
To use Oracle inside Virtual private server You should install OpenVZ, create
new Container (i.e. new Virtual Private server), then install Oracle inside this
container as described in our article.
thank you,
Vasily Averin
Vasily Averin wrote:
Hi Shawn,
duyuyang wrote:
Quoting Eric W. Biederman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 20:59 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Feh, so of course sysfs would have the most interactions for a device
namespace, but now we have pty, network, and user namespace all needing
some sort of sysfs solution. For a
On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 07:25 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Subrata Modak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Mon, 2008-04-14 at 18:01 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
On Mon, 2008-04-14 at 18:01 +0530, Veerendra Chandrappa wrote:
Hi Sukadev,
That sounds nice, I will integrate them
Serge E. Hallyn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm hoping to be able to get back at this in the week or so as things
settle down from my move. My last patches should be in my proof of
concept network namespace tree, if they don't show up elsewhere.
Is that the tree I'd get from
git-fetch
Quoting Dave Hansen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 23:36 +0400, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 07:44:59AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
. echo LONG XX /proc/self/task/my_tid/next_id
next object to be created will have an id set to XX
. echo
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 11:56:20AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 23:36 +0400, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 07:44:59AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
. echo LONG XX /proc/self/task/my_tid/next_id
next object to be created will have an id set to
On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 01:01 +0400, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 11:56:20AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 23:36 +0400, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
a) should mainline kernel have checkpoint/restart feature at all
b) if yes, should it be done from kernel- or
The function does not modify anything (except the temporary
css template), so it's sufficient to hold read lock.
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
kernel/cgroup.c |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c
index
