Hi, Kamezawa-san.
Sorry for late reply.
On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 10:52:35 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Move Usage at Task Move (just an experimantal for discussion)
I tested this but don't think bug-free.
In current memcg, when task moves to a new cg, the usage remains in the
Balbir Singh wrote:
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 01:32:58 +0200
Andrea Righi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Provide distinct cgroup VM overcommit accounting and handling using the
memory
resource controller.
Could you explain the benefits of this even when we have memrlimit
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:35:50 +0900
Daisuke Nishimura [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Kamezawa-san.
Sorry for late reply.
On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 10:52:35 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Move Usage at Task Move (just an experimantal for discussion)
I tested this but don't
Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
Balbir Singh wrote:
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 01:32:58 +0200
Andrea Righi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Provide distinct cgroup VM overcommit accounting and handling using the
memory
resource controller.
Could you explain the benefits of this even
Fix missing initialization in save_msgq_data() that triggers a segfault
in realloc() when cr is compiled with -g.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Thery [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
container_ckpt.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: cryodev/container_ckpt.c
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 14:50:32 +0900 (JST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote:
3. Use Lazy Manner
When the task moves, we can mark the pages used by it as
Wrong Charge, Should be dropped, and add them some penalty in the
LRU.
Pros.
- no
Hi,
Den basically banned iptables in netns via this patch
--- a/net/netfilter/core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/core.c
@@ -165,14 +165,6 @@ int nf_hook_slow(int pf, unsigned int hook, struct sk_buff
*skb,
unsigned int verdict;
int ret = 0;
-#ifdef CONFIG_NET_NS
- struct net
On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 01:33 +0200, Andrea Righi wrote:
+ preempt_disable();
+ committed = atomic_long_read(p-vm_committed_space);
+ atomic_long_sub(committed, old_mem-vmacct.vm_committed_space);
+ atomic_long_add(committed, mem-vmacct.vm_committed_space);
+
On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 01:33 +0200, Andrea Righi wrote:
+ cgroup_unlock();
+
+ count = sprintf(page, CommitLimit: %8lu kB\n
+ Committed_AS: %8lu kB\n,
+ K(allowed), K(committed));
+ ret =
Quoting kathys ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Nadia Derbey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Nadia Derbey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Cedric Le Goater wrote:
Looks like it has worked for me (msg1 creates 1000 msg
From faa707a44b971f5f3bf24e6a0c760ccb4ad278e6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Serge Hallyn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 15:57:32 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] cgroup_clone: use pid of newly created task for new cgroup
cgroup_clone creates a new cgroup with the pid of the task. This works
Quoting Benjamin Thery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Greg,
Here is an updated version of the sysfs tagged directories that improves
a bit the situation over the previous one.
I've modified the patch 09 (Enable tagging for net_class directories in
sysfs) to be a bit less intrusive in sysfs core.
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 05:50:24PM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Benjamin Thery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Greg,
Here is an updated version of the sysfs tagged directories that improves
a bit the situation over the previous one.
I've modified the patch 09 (Enable tagging for
Rather than just documenting this in the readme, actually spit
out a warning on it.
You can pull from: git://git.sr71.net/~dave/cryo-forhallyn.git/
-- Dave
___
Containers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 21:57:03 +0900 (JST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote:
5. try to move charges as your patch does.
if the target cgroup's usage is going to exceed the limit,
try to shrink it. if it failed, just leave it exceeded.
(ie. no rollback)
for the
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 17:26:37 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a trial to move usage from old cg to new cg at task move.
Finally, you'll see the problems we have to handle are failure and
rollback.
This one's Basic algorithm is
0. can_attach()
Quoting Dave Hansen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Rather than just documenting this in the readme, actually spit
out a warning on it.
You can pull from: git://git.sr71.net/~dave/cryo-forhallyn.git/
-- Dave
Thanks, merged.
-serge
___
Containers mailing
I'm now considering following logic. How do you think ?
Assume: move TASK from group:CURR to group:DEST.
== move_task(TASK, CURR, DEST)
if (DEST's limit is unlimited)
moving TASK
return success.
usage = check_usage_of_task(TASK).
/* try to reserve enough room in
having said that, if you decide to put too large tasks into
a cgroup with too small limit, i don't think that there are
many choices besides OOM-kill and allowing exceed.
IMHO, allowing exceed is harmfull without changing the definition of limit.
limit is hard-limit, now, not
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:14:37 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:44:46 +0900 (JST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote:
I'm now considering following logic. How do you think ?
Assume: move TASK from group:CURR to group:DEST.
==
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:44:46 +0900 (JST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote:
I'm now considering following logic. How do you think ?
Assume: move TASK from group:CURR to group:DEST.
== move_task(TASK, CURR, DEST)
if (DEST's limit is unlimited)
moving TASK
21 matches
Mail list logo
