[Devel] Re: [PATCH 01/10] Documentation

2009-04-05 Thread Andrea Righi
On 2009-03-12 19:01, Vivek Goyal wrote: On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 12:11:46AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 21:56:46 -0400 Vivek Goyal vgo...@redhat.com wrote: [snip] Also.. there are so many IO controller implementations that I've lost track of who is doing what. I do have

[Devel] Re: [RFC v14-rc2][PATCH 24/29] c/r: Add CR_COPY() macro (v4)

2009-04-05 Thread Oren Laadan
ok, thanks. Dan Smith wrote: SH That's sucky... yeah i would say a comment, though of course it SH could be one of those cases where everyone but me already knows... Here's a nice fix brought to us by Mr. Lynch... ___ Containers mailing list

[Devel] Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86: c/r support (for now) requires compat_vdso

2009-04-05 Thread Oren Laadan
Ok, applied. Serge E. Hallyn wrote: Make x86 support depend on it (for now). Signed-off-by: Serge E. Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com --- arch/x86/Kconfig |1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig index 246e26b..efc462a 100644

[Devel] Re: [RFC v14-rc2][PATCH 6/7] sysvipc-shm: export interface from ipc/shm.c to delete ipc shm

2009-04-05 Thread Oren Laadan
Matt Helsley wrote: On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 01:32:31AM -0400, Oren Laadan wrote: Signed-off-by: Oren Laadan or...@cs.columbia.edu The description is empty and this patch is rather pointless without 7/7. Any reason you kept it separate from 7/7? At the very least this patch needs a brief

[Devel] Re: [PATCH 2/3] c/r: Add UTS support (v6)

2009-04-05 Thread Oren Laadan
Dan Smith wrote: SH One thing to note is that this will drive the ns cgroup bananas. SH It might still be worthwhile collecting the flags for all the SH to-be-unshared namespaces, and then doing all of the unsharing at SH once. Okay, that's fair. SH Futhermore, you do sys_unshare here,

[Devel] Re: sysfs tagged directory support status (was:. Re: [PATCH 1/8] sysfs: Implement sysfs tagged directory support)

2009-04-05 Thread Mark Ryden
Hello, I am sorry to hear that it is not merged yet.I hoped to try to start a project with network namespaces. Regards, Mark On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 6:05 AM, Greg KH gre...@suse.de wrote: On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 01:00:53PM +0300, Mark Ryden wrote: Hello,   I am back to it and I just want to

[Devel] Re: sysfs tagged directory support status (was:. Re: [PATCH 1/8] sysfs: Implement sysfs tagged directory support)

2009-04-05 Thread Serge E. Hallyn
Quoting Mark Ryden (markr...@gmail.com): Hello, I am sorry to hear that it is not merged yet.I hoped to try to start a project with network namespaces. Sysfs tagged directories are not supported, but with 2.6.29 you can use network namespaces. There are some limits - you can't move a physical