On 2009-03-12 19:01, Vivek Goyal wrote:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 12:11:46AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 21:56:46 -0400 Vivek Goyal vgo...@redhat.com wrote:
[snip]
Also.. there are so many IO controller implementations that I've lost
track of who is doing what. I do have
ok, thanks.
Dan Smith wrote:
SH That's sucky... yeah i would say a comment, though of course it
SH could be one of those cases where everyone but me already knows...
Here's a nice fix brought to us by Mr. Lynch...
___
Containers mailing list
Ok, applied.
Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Make x86 support depend on it (for now).
Signed-off-by: Serge E. Hallyn se...@us.ibm.com
---
arch/x86/Kconfig |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
index 246e26b..efc462a 100644
Matt Helsley wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 01:32:31AM -0400, Oren Laadan wrote:
Signed-off-by: Oren Laadan or...@cs.columbia.edu
The description is empty and this patch is rather pointless without 7/7.
Any reason you kept it separate from 7/7? At the very least this patch
needs a brief
Dan Smith wrote:
SH One thing to note is that this will drive the ns cgroup bananas.
SH It might still be worthwhile collecting the flags for all the
SH to-be-unshared namespaces, and then doing all of the unsharing at
SH once.
Okay, that's fair.
SH Futhermore, you do sys_unshare here,
Hello,
I am sorry to hear that it is not merged yet.I hoped to try to start a
project with network namespaces.
Regards,
Mark
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 6:05 AM, Greg KH gre...@suse.de wrote:
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 01:00:53PM +0300, Mark Ryden wrote:
Hello,
I am back to it and I just want to
Quoting Mark Ryden (markr...@gmail.com):
Hello,
I am sorry to hear that it is not merged yet.I hoped to try to start a
project with network namespaces.
Sysfs tagged directories are not supported, but with 2.6.29 you
can use network namespaces. There are some limits - you can't
move a physical