From: Xin Long
This waring can be triggered simply by:
# ip xfrm policy update src 192.168.1.1/24 dst 192.168.1.2/24 dir in \
priority 1 mark 0 mask 0x10 #[1]
# ip xfrm policy update src 192.168.1.1/24 dst 192.168.1.2/24 dir in \
priority 2 mark 0 mask 0x1 #[2]
# ip xfrm policy
From: Xin Long
In commit ed17b8d377ea ("xfrm: fix a warning in xfrm_policy_insert_list"),
it would take 'priority' to make a policy unique, and allow duplicated
policies with different 'priority' to be added, which is not expected
by userland, as Tobias reported in strongswan.
To fix this duplic
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso
Otherwise, we hit bogus ENOENT when removing elements.
Fixes: e701001e7cbe ("netfilter: nft_rbtree: allow adjacent intervals with
dynamic updates")
Reported-by: Václav Zindulka
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso
(cherry-picked from commit 05b7639da55fb9866a1f4b7e899
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso
The existing rbtree implementation might store consecutive elements
where the closing element and the opening element might overlap, eg.
[ a, a+1) [ a+1, a+2)
This patch removes the optimization for non-anonymous sets in the exact
matching case, where it is assum
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso
This patch fixes dynamic element updates for adjacent intervals in the
rb-tree representation.
Since elements are sorted in the rb-tree, in case of adjacent nodes with
the same key, the assumption is that an interval end node must be placed
before an interval opening.
In
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso
The existing code selects no next branch to be inspected when
re-inserting an inactive element into the rb-tree, looping endlessly.
This patch restricts the check for active elements to the EEXIST case
only.
Fixes: e701001e7cbe ("netfilter: nft_rbtree: allow adjacent inte
